quoted 3 lines I've not yet heard vibert's big soup but have in my hands now do unto>I've not yet heard vibert's big soup but have in my hands now do unto
>others. why does it say "taken from the forthcoming album on mowax 'big
>soup'"? according to his discography none of the tracks are in common.
It's true - none of the tracks are on the LP. The evil Mr Vibert strikes
again!!
Having heard "Do Unto Others" though, I'm pretty glad it never made it.
A bit too trip-hop by numbers with flutes if you ask me. B-Side's may
well be pretty good though.
quoted 1 line or is it perhaps quite literally *taken* from the album. removed.>or is it perhaps quite literally *taken* from the album. removed.
This is a moot point, because rumours before the release of Big Soup
said that a 140 minute quadruple LP was on its way. So where the hell
are the other tracks? A track "Sharp AZ" appeared on one of the Headz 2
compilations and there's the tracks from "Do Unto Others", so maybe
these were going to feature but didn't. It's probably for the best
though, as I for one am getting fed up with all those Mo Wax
epic-in-length, even more epic-in-price releases which it seems would
look better hung on the wall than heard on the turntables or in the CD
player.
Even worse is that this pruning wasn't enough, so they took some more
tracks off the CD. Fortunately I own the vinyl version, and although
it's sweet revenge for us vinyl buyers who usually have to put up with
tracks on the CD being left off the 'DJ friendly' vinyl (how can leaving
stuff *off* be considered DJ friendly bar making the pressing louder -
put it on more bits of vinyl you cheapskates). Even so this must have
really annoyed some people.
Anyway, I digress. Can anyone shed any light on the mystery of the
missing soup?