179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
To:
,
Date:
Tue, 26 Aug 1997 02:54:51 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Threads mk.II
Msg-Id:
<970826025451_17569462@emout08.mail.aol.com>
Mbox:
idm.9708.gz
I heard that music CDR's aren't that great because most of the time they skip-sometimes they don't... very inconsistent... extremely sensative, etc. I heard this is only with the computer CDR's, not with the home audio CDR's. (which use totally different techniques to achieve the same thing.) but this is just what I hear..... true? In a message dated 8/26/97 6:44:30 AM, kymtosh@student.adelaide.edu.au wrote:
quoted 13 lines Have been thinking about this for a while .. since I have easy axs> > Have been thinking about this for a while .. since I have easy axs > to a cd-burner and many gigs of HD space , I would be happy to > put together a "Threads" style cd .. I guess I'd need submissions > on DAT , + then a voting system ala Mr.Parry's ... of course it > would be considerably smaller in scale (considering I'm just > using CDR's) . > > Anyway , just thought I'd do an interest test , because even if > I do get enough interest , I'll have to wait a couple of months > before I have time .. > > Tim.