quoted 5 lines Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 14:42:20 +0000
> Date: Sun, 20 Jul 1997 14:42:20 +0000
> From: 0 <galaxey@earthlink.net>
> Reply-to: galaxey@earthlink.net
> To: "idm@hyperreal.org" <idm@hyperreal.org>
> Subject: (idm) will it be in the history booksquoted 5 lines THis is *NOT* a continuation of the thread that won't die. It is a theoretical
> THis is *NOT* a continuation of the thread that won't die. It is a theoretical
> question for the INTELLIGENT people the list. I ask, are we on the road to
> making our mark in popular music's history??? Should we care??? Maybe we
> have tooo many sub-genre's within electronic music for it to be well represented.
> So, maybe I shouldn't worry, eh?
I think that there probably are too many sub-genres... just within
the list, so many are brought up that sometimes the definition of
what we are supposed to discuss here (at least for me) gets pretty
muddled... I'm not saying that I NEED a clear definition, just that
there's alot of stuff going on.
There's some movie being made on rave culture by Hypnotic (Cleopatra)
and I highly doubt anything discussed here will even be touched on...
of course, I'm sure, as with Cleo comps, it'll probably cover mostly
THEIR artists =)
Anyways, are the artists here really making a mark? I know that on
rec.music.industrial, I am more and more seeing the names Autechre
and Aphex brought up... FSOL was being mention constantly for a
while. Maybe, if more people do start getting into it, it will start
influencing other completely different genres (say industrial, if it
hasn't already) and then I'd say, ya, its made a mark... otherwise, I
couldn't say... but then, what the hell do I know =)
__________________________________________
brap@sonic.net *** sfwd@sonic.net
http://www.sonic.net/~brap/
DOT.info.station the.hardcore.outdated.GPO.page
c.Gosselin, POBox8264, Santa Rosa, CA 95407