179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Brock Suter
To:
Christopher Fahey
Cc:
'buh@clark.net' , 'idm@hyperreal.com'
Date:
Mon, 23 Jun 1997 17:28:54 -0700
Subject:
Re: (idm) giving up
Msg-Id:
<33AF14C6.B00AD0B0@alchemyfx.com>
Mbox:
idm.9706.gz
Christopher Fahey wrote:
quoted 11 lines The whole point of Squarepusher is, to me, that the drums are not "breaks", but> The whole point of Squarepusher is, to me, that the drums are not "breaks", but > are rather very complex drum tracks integrated into the composition as musch as > the melody is. Most of his songs have zero repeated measures in the drum track. > He's not using breaks, he programming a full 5 minutes worth of drums which > change all the time because he programmed them with the skill and feel of a > live drummer. Most electronic musicians create beats in two ways: One is > sampling. The other is programming, and most artists only program the > equivalent of four or five seconds of drums for a three minute track. A d&b > artist might program 10-20 seconds, but still they repeat measures like crazy > and it *feels* sequenced. You can almost *see* the horizontal bars on their > little mac screen. With TJ, all bets are off. "How's he do it?" you wonder.
Bullshit. With cubase, programming 5 minutes of chopped up breaks is easy as drawing fucking stick figures. Nico from No-U-Turn showed me how to do it years ago, and the first time I tried, it sounded EXACTLY like a squarepusher track. Oh well, maybe I'm blessed? I doubt it... (sigh) peace out, brock. (who is suffering a hang over from trying to hang with the big dogs) np: nothing