179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
g.
To:
Date:
Fri, 23 May 1997 15:10:49 GMT
Subject:
Re: (idm) Hård Normal Daddy
Msg-Id:
<3386b30e.22500188@sygnet.syspace.co.uk>
In-Reply-To:
<9705230953.ZM23634@gettins.bche.uic.edu>
Mbox:
idm.9705.gz
On Fri, 23 May 1997 09:53:40 -0500, you wrote:
quoted 17 lines On May 22, 6:11pm, Nate Harrison \[Digital Magician Inc\] wrote:>On May 22, 6:11pm, Nate Harrison \[Digital Magician Inc\] wrote: > >> Subject: Re: (idm) =?iso-8859-1?Q?H=E5rd_Normal_Daddy?= >> You can't hardly even call this d&b really IMHO. It's >> just called Squarepusher. > >It sure sounds like a breakbeat to me. I've listened to much of the new album >and thought it was really good stuff but its not that far removed from the >realm of drum and bass being produced. Check out the Original Playboys (12" on >R&S or their mix of U.F.O) for some very organic jazzy sound stuff from a year >or so back. >Its unclear why people seem to be treating D'n'B like they did trip hop (not >specifically Nate). Its like the black sheep we all love in secret but >publicly cast doubt on. Do we need to call it something else too? Why would >people say that the breakbeat is stylistically limited? It certainly has more >possibility for variation than 4-on-the-floor, and that's been feeding you >folks for the past 20-30 years.
controversial i know but why don't you just call it music? big beat is dead long live speed garage.............etc g.