179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Kayser Soze
To:
Date:
Sun, 09 Mar 1997 13:26:59 -0600
Subject:
Re: (idm) Re: i've not yet said my piece on u2.
Msg-Id:
<33230F03.6604@dls.net>
Mbox:
idm.9703.gz
Hello, all. Now get ready for this. Hopefully my email can settle all of this. But more likely, everyone's going to tell me to go f**k myself. I've been on this list in one form or another for about 4 years now, so I DEFINITELY know the meaning of IDM within the context of this list. Here's the dope: IDM (Intelligent Dance Music) was a term that gained usage after it was defined on the first Artificial Intelligence sampler (WaxTrax!). The music is not necessarily for dancing, but it should be fairly groovy (unlike straight ambient). Imagine kind of standing in one place and bouncing around to a song without having to move your feet. The song you're listening to at that time would be classified as IDM. I know there's a lot of crossover, so the term has to be used loosely. Bands like U2 (I still like them), don't qualify as IDM, as this is not typically their type of music, and the extent of their entry into this "genre" depends on who's producing their latest album. For instance, Saint Etienne are not IDM, but many of the bands who remix them make IDM music. Therefore, you're welcome to talk about those remixes, but please go elsewhere in search of bands who play the type of music which Saint Etienne create themselves. Neither U2, or their producers and their remixers qualify as IDM. You may want to discuss this stuff on alt.music.techno (I believe) or some alternative mailing list. If you go there, you won't be flamed or sworn at, you'll find people with similar interests, and none of us will need to read hundreds of emails about something which is pretty cut and dry to begin with. So without further adieu, let the mud fly. I can take it. Kayser Soze (the mystery man)