On Tue, 28 May 1996, James Skilton wrote:
quoted 5 lines And highly debatable if the KLF are really involved. The "aka KLF" has been> And highly debatable if the KLF are really involved. The "aka KLF" has been
> added by the distributor and is not on the record or packaging. The consensus
> on the KLF list (klf@xmission.com) is that bill & jim are not involved; for a
> number of reasons - for a start it's nothing like as good as anything they've
> done before, not even their tackiest, most piss-taking stuff
Really? It's hard to imagine something being much worse than 1987. :) I was
dissapointed when I got that one. I know it was a pisstake,
but it wasn't all that funny either. My favourite parts of 1987 are
the illegal samples. :)
T.