At 16:28 30/04/96 -0700, you wrote:
quoted 6 lines Rumours are that Mike Ink will release a record on Warp in a few months.>>>Rumours are that Mike Ink will release a record on Warp in a few months.
>>>Any details anybody?
>>
>>top secret mate.
>
>"As if suddenly, we were buddies."
lighten up!
quoted 8 lines Is there any point to responses like this? It's really perplexing to me that>Is there any point to responses like this? It's really perplexing to me that
>in a style of music like this that doesn't get a lot of exposure and is
>largely driven by word-of-mouth, that obstacles would be placed in the way
>of info and artists that people are curious about. Is there a legitimate
>concern that hype or profits might be piggybacked that would call for
>counterintelligent tactics? Cryptic tack-ons implying additional witheld
>info ain't no way to treat your mates, either. I guess people really go for
>those Rephlex head-games.
Uhm, yeah, cos it's fun :) Bur seriously I probably gave away more than I
should with *that* post. There was a rather unsubtle hint as to mix content
in there. Nobody says we have to make it easy for you. As soon as I have a
signed contract, then you get the full info. But before that I could my
myself look a right plonker if something fell through, or mixes didn't
happen or anything. You lot would be the first to complain if say a Plaid
mix actually turned out to be Autechre mix, then oops sorry projects cancelled.
My Mike Ink post was quite calculated. I can't really comment on the project
for the reasons above, but I did implicitly imply that the project existed
and slipped you a cryptic clue for good measure.
so there :)
g.