one upon a tom in a far off distant land, Sugatis told the sea:
quoted 2 lines it's ok if you want to pitch things in wierd ways, but you know, the songs
>it's ok if you want to pitch things in wierd ways, but you know, the songs
>>weren't really designed that way, now were they?
well, i don't think guitar, or voices, or I IV V were *designed* to be
recorded backwards, either, but it sure sounds good sometimes, doesn't it?
john lennon obviously thought so. i don't think quentin tarantino meant to
have ezekiel 25:17 (sp?) incorporated into a jungle track either, but to
some artists it sounded appropriate. regardless of my 4am analogies, when
an artist releases something to be consumed/evaluated to the public, they
allow it to be open to different interpretations. mixing tracks together or
playing the music at the wrong speed is one person's way of interpreting a
song. music or art isn't 'designed' for any singular holy purpose. it's
what you individually make of it.
obidm: finally obtained the 'tri repetae' 2cd package and it's
yum-yum-yummy. i'm not sure if i like it as much as 'amber,' but it's still
autechre, it's still crunchy, and i like it a lot anyway. anyone want to
buy a garbage ep? $6 ppd. *sigh*
thinking about bringing the old 16(?)-33-45-78rpm magnavox to school to try
out labradford on it,
.joanna.
---
joroses@mail.utexas.edu
http://piglet.cc.utexas.edu/~joanna
| () | <-- protect free speech online
| /\ | <--
http://www.eff.org/BlueRibbon/activism.html