179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
James Skilton
To:
, idm
Date:
Fri, 11 Aug 95 16:08:49 +0100 (BST)
Subject:
Re: i got it (FWD) (666)
Msg-Id:
<MAPI.Id.0016.00616d65737320203730434330303032@MAPI.to.RFC822>
In-Reply-To:
<192@chrchfam.demon.co.uk>
Mbox:
idm.9508.gz
Tom Churchill wrote on Fri, 11 Aug 95 12:03:03 BST :
quoted 3 lines Sorry to prolong a boring debate, but I had to say a couple of> > Sorry to prolong a boring debate, but I had to say a couple of > things...
You should never start an email like that, don't bloody apologise - if you really meant it you wouldn't have posted, and anyway it hasn't got _that_ boring yet :) <no flame intended> ....
quoted 3 lines that they sample other people? Just because it's called 'acid' jazz> that they sample other people? Just because it's called 'acid' jazz > doesn't mean > they use samplers all the time...
That wasn't the case with "acid" house either, at least not until the UK scene developed - the original chicago "acid" sound in 1987 meant 303, as it does now, the UK "acid" scene of 88 was quite a different thing imo. But your statement is of course equally true if you substitute "303s" for "samplers" I guess I've takena bit of a tangent there - back to the core: The name "Acid Jazz" was surely introduced as something of a play on words or joke due to the trendiness/hype/whatever surrounding "acid house". Am I right? J ^ __________ ________.__/_____ _||_/ James Skilton aka Steady J _[]/_____________[.__\____-_ DJ and Party Animal | | Part Time Hedonist |____________________________| Full Time Technohead |__|-' '-|__| Steady-J@Firefox.co.uk