179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Mark Kolmar
To:
ozymandias G desiderata
Cc:
Intelligent Dance Music , AnalogueHeaven
Date:
Mon, 12 Jun 1995 21:21:03 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:
Re: Query??
Msg-Id:
<Pine.PTX.3.91.950612210506.288A-100000@ccs.nslsilus.org>
In-Reply-To:
<9506122204.AA13947@selway.umt.edu>
Mbox:
idm.9506.gz
On Mon, 12 Jun 1995, ozymandias G desiderata wrote:
quoted 5 lines Is there anybody but me that sees the irony in the fact that> Is there anybody but me that sees the irony in the fact that > it frequently seems like techno musicians are making the music of > tomorrow with the technology of ten years ago? Is that how long it > takes to understand a given synthesizer? Maybe I'd better stick with > guitar.
That's how long it takes some people to forget how a particular machine was marketed and what it was "supposed" to do. The early drum machines were designed to be substandard substitute for a live drummer, for a demo, for sketching, for practicing. Some artists early on integrated electronic percussion with a human drummer, and also as a true replacement for live drums. The Roland TB-303 was designed to be a bad replacement for a bass guitar. It is now the archetypical acid machine. I don't think it takes that long to figure out a given synthesizer, it's just taken that long for these sounds to become more common.