179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Alan M. Parry
To:
IDM
Date:
Mon, 23 Jan 1995 18:14:54 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
Re: We need more serious criticism of techno! (long rant)
Msg-Id:
<Pine.BSI.3.91.950123181400.9045C-100000@taz.hyperreal.com>
Mbox:
idm.9501.gz
!!! Mail forwarded by idm-owner, fluid@hyperreal.com !!! !!! Original message and sender below !!! To: idm@hyperreal.com From: dvmiller+@osu.edu (Dave Miller) Subject: Re: We need more serious criticism of techno! (long rant) After reading the first two replies to this post, I think I finally have to add my two cents to a discussion. Here goes nothing... I think the point that is being made here is that techno needs some forum where it is discussed seriously and how it relates to other forms of music and to the culture that it represents, or from whiuch it is derived. This doesn't mean that there is no room for reviews that simply say "This track kicked ass and took names!", but in the braoder perspective, techno of all forms needs to have some thoughtful criticism and commentary if it is to become anything besides a marginal part of music history. This just means that *some* people who make, write about, or listen to techno have to think about what it is that makes this music a vital form of expression. Nothing is created in a vacuum. Sometimes, a bedroom full of blinking silver boxes may seem like it is seperate from the rest of the universe, but unless you have never heard any other music, *ever* or have *never* experienced anything outside your room, you bring all that you've expperienced into the creative process. Unfortunately, it seems that most artists out there are pretty much unaware of *why* they do what they do. Things done solely because 'it sounded really neat' are ultimately very empty, there's nothing below the surface. It's not about making techno 'political' either. Most people who listen to techno have no idea what the person making it looks like, so race doesn't enter into their minds. But, if you take a look at where techno came from (as far as the people who started it) and the typical attendee at a rave, you'll notice quite a difference. So the question that Ozymandias is asking is: why is techno such a predominantly white, suburban thing? (Outside of Detroit, Chicago, NY, etc...) OK, my mind is all twisted around now, so I'll stop. My points in a nutshell: 1. People who make techno need to start thinking about *why* they do it; otherwise, this is all just a pointless tangent in history. 2. Maybe just a couple of people could notice that how something that started out as a definite part of inner-city culture has been co-opted by white, suburban kids. Dave