179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

Re: [idm] Radiohead 00

10 messages · 8 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
◇ merged from 2 subjects: radiohead (not off topic) · radiohead 00
2000-09-12 07:17[idm] Radiohead (NOT off topic)
├─ 2000-09-12 06:57Konstantin Minko RE: [idm] Radiohead (NOT off topic)
└─ 2000-09-12 15:34Jeff Pitrman Re: [idm] Radiohead (NOT off topic)
2000-09-12 08:00metacipher [idm] Radiohead 00
2000-09-12 08:18Ben Hatchelt Re: [idm] Radiohead 00
2000-09-12 08:22Re: [idm] Radiohead 00
└─ 2000-09-12 08:40Matt Anderson RE: [idm] Radiohead 00
2000-09-12 16:28Ron Jeremy Re: [idm] Radiohead 00
2000-09-12 16:59Re: [idm] Radiohead 00
2000-09-13 07:29Ben Hatchelt Re: [idm] Radiohead 00
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2000-09-12 07:17Cichli@aol.comRadiohead's new album, Kid A, is going to be heavily electronic, and you will all be talki
From:
To:
Date:
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 03:17:37 EDT
Subject:
[idm] Radiohead (NOT off topic)
permalink · <7e.a234bd5.26ef3291@aol.com>
Radiohead's new album, Kid A, is going to be heavily electronic, and you will all be talking about it. 'tis the future of IDM as you didn't know it could ever be, boys and girls. :jason (ecux) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-09-12 06:57Konstantin MinkoI adored Radiohead without them being electronic. They're not just an ordinary rock band -
From:
Konstantin Minko
To:
,
Date:
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 10:57:18 +0400
Subject:
RE: [idm] Radiohead (NOT off topic)
Reply to:
[idm] Radiohead (NOT off topic)
permalink · <NEBBIFENILJCLEJGAIINIEAEDIAA.ibss@ukrpack.net>
I adored Radiohead without them being electronic. They're not just an ordinary rock band - they have feelings woven in their tracks - intellegent rock I dare to say. Let's wait for something new from them. Alien np: Matmos mp3s - I like them! 8) -----Original Message----- From: Cichli@aol.com [mailto:Cichli@aol.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 11:18 AM To: idm@hyperreal.org Subject: [idm] Radiohead (NOT off topic) Radiohead's new album, Kid A, is going to be heavily electronic, and you will all be talking about it. 'tis the future of IDM as you didn't know it could ever be, boys and girls. :jason (ecux) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-09-12 15:34Jeff PitrmanAt 03:17 AM 9/12/2000 -0400, Cichli@aol.com wrote: >Radiohead's new album, Kid A, is going
From:
Jeff Pitrman
To:
Date:
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 08:34:29 -0700
Subject:
Re: [idm] Radiohead (NOT off topic)
Reply to:
[idm] Radiohead (NOT off topic)
permalink · <4.3.2.7.2.20000912081921.00b8f380@netmail.home.com>
At 03:17 AM 9/12/2000 -0400, Cichli@aol.com wrote:
quoted 3 lines Radiohead's new album, Kid A, is going to be heavily electronic, and you will>Radiohead's new album, Kid A, is going to be heavily electronic, and you will >all be talking about it. 'tis the future of IDM as you didn't know it could >ever be, boys and girls.
No, it's some decent synth plonkings mostly ruined by this guy's terrible, terrible falsetto singing. I like the instrumental tracks enough, but homeboy really needs to try a new vocal angle. It grates my nerves like a food processor after about 5 seconds. I'm totally at a loss how anyone can be that into his voice. I guess it's relatively 'intelligent,' but mostly it just sounds like more plodding rock music to me. Still, they're head and shoulders above most bands that sound like that. I do like their stickers and t-shirts and general graphic design angle though. Their slogans and little diagrams are all very cute. ---- "A typewriter is more architectural than all those building projects which win prizes at academies and competitions." - Giacomo Balla [http://spof.net] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-09-12 08:00metaciphermay as well get in on the fall00 thread in its infancy: i have downloaded a solitary studi
From:
metacipher
To:
Date:
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 04:00:27 -0400
Subject:
[idm] Radiohead 00
permalink · <001b01c01c8f$83741da0$59f31681@cwru.edu>
may as well get in on the fall00 thread in its infancy: i have downloaded a solitary studio 'kid a' track off napsta just minutes ago: idioteque. this is purported to be their discoest track of the new. as could be expected, it is severely good. sharp attention aversion at 11 seconds, echoic 4/4 snare beat with tight bass kicks a la funkstorung, falling -or- rolling shrapnel on the left in the :45 range, spacious vocals('i swallow till i burst'), synthetic hollow sounds pitched around a la plastikman on the left during second verse, reverse effect mimics the beat at 3:10, loads of awry whirring(more akin to the end of 'blowout'(pablo honey) than, say, 'airbag'), 'climbing up the walls'esque comedown. 'everything, all of the time', indeed. though then where is the discussion in this? will the album validate idm on/ fused with a major? is there anyone on the list who is not eager to listen to it? does the band dance to its own idm? can it be a success by the idm standard if it is excellently piercing but not innovative in comparison to those artists of routine discussion? when will there be a kid606 remix? ]]xe/dave/meta*[[ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-09-12 08:18Ben Hatchelt>is there anyone on the list who is not eager to >listen to it? If Radiohead are the futur
From:
Ben Hatchelt
To:
Date:
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 09:18:30 +0100 (BST)
Subject:
Re: [idm] Radiohead 00
permalink · <20000912081830.26553.qmail@web5204.mail.yahoo.com>
quoted 2 lines is there anyone on the list who is not eager to>is there anyone on the list who is not eager to >listen to it?
If Radiohead are the future of 'idm' kill me now. ____________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-09-12 08:22Cichli@aol.comBen wrote: [If Radiohead are the future of 'idm' kill me now.] die. die. die. die. . . . .
From:
To:
Date:
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 04:22:21 EDT
Subject:
Re: [idm] Radiohead 00
permalink · <7c.ace1948.26ef41bd@aol.com>
Ben wrote: [If Radiohead are the future of 'idm' kill me now.] die. die. die. die. . . . . . ...are you dead yet? (tee-hee-hee) :jason (ecux) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-09-12 08:40Matt AndersonI'll feed the fire... I'm listening to a few tracks of it from napster right now, and jesu
From:
Matt Anderson
To:
IDM LIST
Date:
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 01:40:41 -0700
Subject:
RE: [idm] Radiohead 00
Reply to:
Re: [idm] Radiohead 00
permalink · <NCBBKNDBGLJADEIFLFFPEEBDCGAA.655321@telus.net>
I'll feed the fire... I'm listening to a few tracks of it from napster right now, and jesus it sounds like a droopy moany college rock band! WHAT IS THE DEAL WITH RADIOHEAD? they're just not that good. But to keep this in context with the previous messages, it is certainly nothing even close to IDM. -Matt- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-09-12 16:28Ron JeremyThanks for the Radiohead news! Since it isn't being popularly received on this list, that
From:
Ron Jeremy
To:
,
Date:
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 09:28:19 PDT
Subject:
Re: [idm] Radiohead 00
permalink · <F326utJLtosJ3Ih7jtr0000a286@hotmail.com>
Thanks for the Radiohead news! Since it isn't being popularly received on this list, that gives me hope that it will be a great lp!! When second rate artists like Kid606 & Funkstorung get good reviews around here, you really have to wonder about the standards on this list. It makes me laugh. Good one boys :) I guess someone has to buy it (or shovel it). Why is there even a discussion about IDM reaching or being accepted by the mainstream. That would just mean the music would have to erode and become watered down. It already has IMHO eroded with the influx of mediocre talents. And why would Radiohead enlist Kid 606 to do a remix when they could get anyone in the world? That would be pathetic!
quoted 9 lines From: "metacipher" <dep3@po.cwru.edu>>From: "metacipher" <dep3@po.cwru.edu> >though then where is the discussion in this? will the album >validate idm on/ fused with a major? is there anyone on the list who is >not >eager to listen to it? does the band dance to its own idm? can it be a >success by the idm standard if it is excellently piercing but not >innovative >in comparison to those artists of routine discussion? when will there >be >a kid606 remix?
_________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at http://profiles.msn.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-09-12 16:59MilkAlive@aol.comIn a message dated 9/12/00 4:29:23 PM, galactic_funk@hotmail.com writes: << And why would
From:
To:
,
Date:
Tue, 12 Sep 2000 12:59:14 EDT
Subject:
Re: [idm] Radiohead 00
permalink · <16.227eff4.26efbae2@aol.com>
In a message dated 9/12/00 4:29:23 PM, galactic_funk@hotmail.com writes: << And why would Radiohead enlist Kid 606 to do a remix when they could get anyone in the world? That would be pathetic! >> because they dig him y'know. no shame in that game sucka. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-09-13 07:29Ben Hatchelterrr...Radiohead suck, Funkstorung don't. bosh. --- Ron Jeremy <galactic_funk@hotmail.com>
From:
Ben Hatchelt
To:
Date:
Wed, 13 Sep 2000 08:29:58 +0100 (BST)
Subject:
Re: [idm] Radiohead 00
permalink · <20000913072958.3603.qmail@web5203.mail.yahoo.com>
errr...Radiohead suck, Funkstorung don't. bosh. --- Ron Jeremy <galactic_funk@hotmail.com> wrote: > Thanks for the Radiohead news! Since it isn't being
quoted 41 lines popularly received on> popularly received on > this list, that gives me hope that it will be a > great lp!! > > When second rate artists like Kid606 & Funkstorung > get good reviews around > here, you really have to wonder about the standards > on this list. > It makes me laugh. Good one boys :) I guess someone > has to buy it (or > shovel it). > > Why is there even a discussion about IDM reaching or > being accepted by the > mainstream. That would just mean the music would > have to erode and become > watered down. It already has IMHO eroded with the > influx of mediocre > talents. > > And why would Radiohead enlist Kid 606 to do a remix > when they could get > anyone in the world? That would be pathetic! > > > >From: "metacipher" <dep3@po.cwru.edu> > >though then where is the discussion in this? will > the album > >validate idm on/ fused with a major? is there > anyone on the list who is > >not > >eager to listen to it? does the band dance to its > own idm? can it be a > >success by the idm standard if it is excellently > piercing but not > >innovative > >in comparison to those artists of routine > discussion? when will there >be > >a kid606 remix? > >
_________________________________________________________________________
quoted 9 lines Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at > http://www.hotmail.com. > > Share information about yourself, create your own > public profile at > http://profiles.msn.com. > > >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
quoted 5 lines To unsubscribe, e-mail:> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: > idm-help@hyperreal.org >
____________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.co.uk address at http://mail.yahoo.co.uk or your free @yahoo.ie address at http://mail.yahoo.ie --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org