179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) More intelligent music

3 messages · 2 participants · spans 3 days · search this subject
2000-01-27 23:25William Samuels (idm) More intelligent music
2000-01-27 23:25William Samuels (idm) More intelligent music
2000-01-31 02:24Re: (idm) More intelligent music
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2000-01-27 23:25William SamuelsCesium5Hz@aol.com wrote: In a message dated 28/01/00 6:45:49 w_technoir@yahoo.com writes:
From:
William Samuels
To:
Cc:
I DM
Date:
Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:25:20 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
(idm) More intelligent music
permalink · <20000127232520.13965.qmail@web2102.mail.yahoo.com>
Cesium5Hz@aol.com wrote: In a message dated 28/01/00 6:45:49 w_technoir@yahoo.com writes:
quoted 2 lines Maybe next years Idm polls should have a Most Intelligent section added to> Maybe next years Idm polls should have a Most Intelligent section added to > every genre.
Oh well, some people can utilise the term/ concept of intelligence within the sphere of a particular music expression, some people can't. Simple isn't it? Ok let's explore this then, what does the word "intelligence" really say about music? Does intelligence=good? Or complexity? Or.... Does that mean music that isn't label "more intelligent" is lesser in any degree? Don't take it too seriously. Its a good release. Lets leave it at that eh? No let's explore this... it could be interesting. And that I'll know when I go to the store, I'll just ask for the "intelligent section". That way I can stay away from all of the icky non-intelligent stuff. --------------------------------- Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
2000-01-27 23:25William SamuelsCesium5Hz@aol.com wrote: In a message dated 28/01/00 6:45:49 w_technoir@yahoo.com writes:
From:
William Samuels
To:
Cc:
I DM
Date:
Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:25:36 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
(idm) More intelligent music
permalink · <20000127232536.24792.qmail@web2103.mail.yahoo.com>
Cesium5Hz@aol.com wrote: In a message dated 28/01/00 6:45:49 w_technoir@yahoo.com writes:
quoted 2 lines Maybe next years Idm polls should have a Most Intelligent section added to> Maybe next years Idm polls should have a Most Intelligent section added to > every genre.
Oh well, some people can utilise the term/ concept of intelligence within the sphere of a particular music expression, some people can't. Simple isn't it? Ok let's explore this then, what does the word "intelligence" really say about music? Does intelligence=good? Or complexity? Or.... Does that mean music that isn't label "more intelligent" is lesser in any degree? Don't take it too seriously. Its a good release. Lets leave it at that eh? No let's explore this... it could be interesting. And that I'll know when I go to the store, I'll just ask for the "intelligent section". That way I can stay away from all of the icky non-intelligent stuff. --------------------------------- Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger.
2000-01-31 02:24Cesium5Hz@aol.comIn a message dated 28/01/00 7:25:46 w_technoir@yahoo.com writes: > Ok let's explore this t
From:
To:
,
Date:
Sun, 30 Jan 2000 21:24:26 EST
Subject:
Re: (idm) More intelligent music
permalink · <e3.b545c7.25c64c5a@aol.com>
In a message dated 28/01/00 7:25:46 w_technoir@yahoo.com writes:
quoted 3 lines Ok let's explore this then, what does the word "intelligence" really say> Ok let's explore this then, what does the word "intelligence" really say > about music? Does intelligence=good? Or complexity? Or.... Does that mean > music that isn't label "more intelligent" is lesser in any degree?
quoted 3 lines Don't take it too seriously. Its a good release. Lets leave it at that eh?> Don't take it too seriously. Its a good release. Lets leave it at that eh? > > No let's explore this... it could be interesting. And that I'll know
when
quoted 2 lines I go to the store, I'll just ask for the "intelligent section". That way I> I go to the store, I'll just ask for the "intelligent section". That way I > can stay away from all of the icky non-intelligent stuff.
Will, The whole reason why I'm not going to go further on this one involves a fraction of the whole debacle about the quality of this idm channel. The whole reason this list might have a tad of controversy surrounding it is that many see intelligence through different paradigms and these models give rise to different subjective interpretations of this music. We could explore this forever but not come to a single agreement. Most of us have an idea of what 'intelligent' music entails - and that often reflects most of the music explored and discussed. If we can all just grasp the concept that other opinions and interpretations of this music is equally as valid to to our own, then there may be a lot less misunderstandings, complaints, self-indulgence - and more musical related posts on this list. A_Zed --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org