| Date | From | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| 2004-09-0820:43 | <ColonyUndaground@aol.com> | Re: [idm] All Uncleared Sampling Ruled Illegal piss on that, i'll sample ja-rule just to piss him… |
| 2004-09-0820:45 | wells oliver <wells@submute.net> | Re: [idm] All Uncleared Sampling Ruled Illegal On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 ColonyUndaground@aol.com wrote:
> piss on that… |
| 2004-09-0822:08 | muffin <muffin@signmytits.com> | Re: [idm] All Uncleared Sampling Ruled Illegal
On 8 Sep 2004, at 20:30, Jeff/Ninja Tune wrote:
> We… |
| 2004-09-0819:47 | Luis-Manuel Garcia <lgarcia@uchicago.edu> | Re: [idm] All Uncleared Sampling Ruled Illegal
On Wednesday, September 8, 2004, at 02:30 PM, Jeff/Ninja Tune… |
| 2004-09-0822:16 | atomly <atomly@atomly.com> | Re: [idm] All Uncleared Sampling Ruled Illegal [muffin |
| 2004-09-0819:10 | Kent Williams <chaircrusher@gmail.com> | [idm] All Uncleared Sampling Ruled Illegal http://news.bostonherald.com/national/view.bg?articleid=43259
What a bunch… |
| 2004-09-0819:35 | atomly <atomly@atomly.com> | Re: [idm] All Uncleared Sampling Ruled Illegal [Jeff/Ninja Tune |
| 2004-09-0821:09 | <MJed5150@aol.com> | Re: [idm] All Uncleared Sampling Ruled Illegal jeff@ninjatune.net wrote ...
"We're actually one of those crazy labels… |
| 2004-09-0914:12 | atomly <atomly@atomly.com> | [idm] Re: (313) All Uncleared Sampling Ruled Illegal [Ken Odeluga |
| 2004-09-1119:31 | wil maurer <battleforitaly@yahoo.com> | Re: [idm] All Uncleared Sampling Ruled Illegal at the same time, the responsibility for pursuing copyright infringement rests
with… |
| 2004-09-0819:30 | Jeff/Ninja Tune <jeff@ninjatune.net> | Re: [idm] All Uncleared Sampling Ruled Illegal What they fail to always recognize is that it's all well… |