sounds like a revolutionary without a revolution.
reacting against the "value" given a product because
the artist would like to make a living, assumes that
there is an actual value in the product, otherwise why
react to it ? (and if value is defined by the
consumer, then it must have value to begin with in
order for therre to be a denial of value) furthermore
the cultural conditions of society (broadly speaking)
have forced the perception that art is somehow
cheapened when there is money involved, your stance
seems to feed right into the established norm, but
does it under the (no doubt well intentioned) idea of
being a martyr for art, which is a total bullshit idea
(although sometimes necessary step in evolution of
authenticity)
--- I'm not a dj <turnstyle@obscure.co.nz> wrote:
quoted 25 lines Martin Dust wrote:
>
>
> Martin Dust wrote:
> >> The question is simple.
> >>
> >> I struggle with Technology ' help me.
> >
> >
> > Put the crack pipe down....
>
>
> I'm living on the edge ' so don't provoke me
>
> if your after sustenance . seek the truth
>
> .
>
> we are crossing a line that has no return
>
> the artist is the sacrifice for understanding
>
>
> .turnstyle
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
quoted 6 lines To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> idm-help@hyperreal.org
>
>
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Personals - Better first dates. More second dates.
http://personals.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org