179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Luis-Manuel Garcia
Cc:
Date:
Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:07:59 -0600
Subject:
Re: [idm] "IDM" and Genre-labeling
Msg-Id:
<a3030a4e09df1dc9dc6228aee28e32e7@uchicago.edu>
In-Reply-To:
<7110265.1108324335830.JavaMail.root@wamui08.slb.atl.earthlink.net>
Mbox:
idm.0502.gz
Hmm.. I always thought that the problem most people had with the IDM label wasn't the Dance part so much as the Intelligent part, and all of the elitist, cartesian mind/body split poopyness it has come to connote. If people have issues with IDM being connected to dance music...well...um... Luis On Feb 13, 2005, at 1:52 PM, Guerdis wrote:
quoted 69 lines It's rather ironic that it's gotten to the point at which "IDM" is now> > It's rather ironic that it's gotten to the point at which "IDM" is now > regarded as either establishmentarian or generally cheesy - or at > least on this list - or at least in the posts I've received since > returning to the list the other day. I joined up on this list back in > its early days (1994-ish) and it was near blasphemy to sideswipe RDJ > et al and one certainly didn't disavow the IDM category lest he or she > be snotted-upon for the crime. > > I come back to hear people talking about AFX being overrated and IDM > being an annoying term - Who's taken over this list? > > Ah yes, the irony part: Formerly, the IDM of AFX was the food of the > elite techno divine and it is now the gravel upon which the commoners > projectile vomit? And who says so? The elite! (Or rather, those who > perceive themselves elite due to the fact that the noise they prefer > is on an unknown and insignificant label (to date).) > > YAWN, people. > > Warp Records is the standard by which all the rest shall be judged, > sayeth the LORD. What else is there, really? Something YOU made? Well, > are YOU on Warp? Is this matter of lack the matter of fact that stirs > your bile? Oh, what a silly notion. No one would ever stoop to such a > low. > > Anyway, the term Intelligent Dance Music is perfect, as it always has > been, for describing what it is we, in general, listen to. Why? > Because idiots, no matter what gets said or written, will always > assume that techno = the shit they play in clubs. It will be, in other > words, DANCE MUSIC regardless of the fact that only someone having a > seizure could possibly dance to most of it. The term is, or at least > it is to me, a little inside joke. What we know is that this is music > to be listened to and appreciated from an intellectual or even > academic point of view, yet this can not be grasped by the unwashed > mass because it's techno and techno is made up of beats to which > people must dance (mainly because techno beats originate from machines > and not some tattooed dickhead with a drum kit and the rest of the > band, or some stuff-lipped woman with a violin and the rest of the > orchestra, or some tobacco-toothed hillbilly and the other country > hicks, etc). > > Terms like Electronica are ones designed by marketeers or other people > looking for descriptive ways to organize their inventory. The fact > that one might find Technotronic in the same section as Autechre is > more than telling that this category is bunk as hell. The term IDM is > one that, as far as I can recall, was bestowed upon the form mostly by > the combination of the music's listeners. > > A very specific term is good for a very specific musical form. "Rock" > described both Elvis and Tool. How is that possible? "Rock" is > generally meaningless, that's how. IDM has a meaning that both > undercuts and supercedes the industry it comes out of. One can produce > "techno" all day long, but there's nothing that will qualify it as IDM > aside from its merits and the general agreement of the listening > audience. > > This, of course, does not solve the whole "Is this IDM or what?" > dilemma (the dilemma being more oriented around the fool who doesn't > know that the music itself) but it does allow for the establishment of > basic criteria for attempting to satisfy that question. > > Pardon me, what the hell am I talking about? > > MG > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org