179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
b.phenix
To:
Sean Horton
Cc:
idm@hyperreal.org
Date:
Fri, 14 Feb 2003 13:07:57 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
Re: [idm] return of soulseek?
Msg-Id:
<Pine.LNX.4.44.0302141259340.19112-100000@grace.speakeasy.net>
In-Reply-To:
<F179Zh66MfRPHo27nlS0001de60@hotmail.com>
Mbox:
idm.0302.gz
:Yes I read the statement from Soul Seek that covered the issue. : :Personally I am astounded that some no name artists can cause such a rukas. welcome to world of DMCA. more on the lawyer-grams can be found here: http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/25829 the fundimental problem is there is no minimum burden of proof that must shown. ISPs are caught in the middle and often it is easier to say goodbye to a customer than fight it (or more costly be held partly responsible.) we have been fighting laws like these for years, but ISPs have never held the same sway as media companies (who also quickly moved in to the data delivery business as well.) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org