179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
nethed
To:
Date:
Tue, 13 Aug 2002 00:42:23 +0100
Subject:
Re: [idm] Prefuse 73/Nick Drake & copyright
Msg-Id:
<p05010441b97df39d752b@[217.36.241.204]>
In-Reply-To:
<F226aa4mdcUTkTmz3tA00003196@hotmail.com>
Mbox:
idm.0208.gz
agree with the statements about licensing but lost track who said what. i thought people were buying nick drake records because his tracks are being used on some gawd awful Young Americans teen soap I caught on UK tv the other day. Fueled with angst the songs still captivate a mood. Not so sure how Nick's estate was set up due to the way he died etc but as i understand it copyright is life of the author plus 70 years which is how disney still has a copyright on Mickey Mouse. Everytime it comes up to a Walt Disney death anniversary and Mickey might come into public domain the Disney Corp goes into overdrive lobbying Congress & the rest of the world to extend the life of copyright.... at least that was one of the trivial things i learned in summer school at harvard. the original idea behind copyright was to give authors, composers etc a period of time in which they could do things like license it to pay for the labours of creating it. many artists (not all) take a point 2 position. you dont like volkswagen - dont license your music to them. i'm sure volkswagen had to get permission from the publisher and the label to use the track especially if this was an ad in the states & somewhere along the line a fee was paid - not to the drake family(altho you'd think they might get a royalty on airplay) you can be sure a label or a publisher were contacted, permission sought & granted with an exchange of paper - not only contracts but a check. _____________________ the music makers are not being bought and sold, what is being bought and sold is a license to use a work of art in a short film or video that at the very worst misleads people into thinking they need something that they do not. since last i checked, nobody needs either prefuse 73, the internet or even television, i don't think any harm is being done. ----------- I think as long as long as an artist feels morally secure in licensing a work to a corporation, then they have every right to do so. --------- Nick Drake's song "Pink Moon" will always be associated with Volkswagen for an enormous number of people. But the flipside of that transaction is that a significant percentage of the people who bought a Nick Drake album within the last year did so because that was the guy from the Volkswagen commercial. This is possibly not the best example since Nick Drake is long dead and does not get to benefit from the licensing of his music -- http://www.ninjatune.net/solidsteel New Archive of Solid Steel mixes http://www.bbc.co.uk/london Monday midnite>2am UK time live mixing --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org