179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Andrei
To:
Date:
Sat, 12 Jan 2002 18:22:49 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] what about Grooves???
Msg-Id:
<Pine.SGI.4.40.0201121738240.8321318-100000@shell01.TheWorld.com>
In-Reply-To:
<000201c19b96$cc00f8e0$0401000a@std.com>
Mbox:
idm.0201.gz
On Sat, 12 Jan 2002, Nicholas Rejack wrote:
quoted 2 lines Sure, Grooves is a decent rag, if you only listen to IDM-List Approved Music> Sure, Grooves is a decent rag, if you only listen to IDM-List Approved Music > (TM).
pretty true
quoted 1 line And dig that line on the cover - "Experimental Electronic Music." ?> And dig that line on the cover - "Experimental Electronic Music." ?
I don't know, I think there are things that get lumped into the IDM category which I think are pretty "experimental" in some aspects (recent Autechre, Mego, Richard Devine, Oval, Phthalocyanine, etc.), but generally I would say most IDM is "experimental" if only compared to mainstream pop music. Even then I think P.E.'s Bomb Squad produced material, for example, was way more radical than the majority of IDM. That whole "experimental" tag is kinda silly anyway. I mean there's experimentation involved in every creative act. Maybe a more appropriate tag for Grooves would be "Non-mainstream Electronic Music" or some silly thing like that. If you wanted to get a sense of electronic music's real cutting edge you could look into MIT's Computer Music Journal or Organised Sound or Musicworks, for example. And while we're on the subject of IDM related mags I like Angbase. http://noiseweb.com/angbase/index.html Andrei --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org