179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Mark Stevens
To:
Date:
Sat, 10 Jul 1999 19:16:02 GMT
Subject:
Re: (idm) LFO
Msg-Id:
<37864ea4.1360714@post.demon.co.uk>
In-Reply-To:
<01JDBGS77H6A8Y53BR@tessco.com>
Mbox:
idm.9907.gz
On Thu, 08 Jul 1999 10:11:59 -0500 (EST), you wrote:
quoted 1 line Probably not, as LFO (the new group) stands for Lyte Funky Ones.>> Probably not, as LFO (the new group) stands for Lyte Funky Ones.
quoted 4 lines that shouldn't matter.>that shouldn't matter. >it's all about confusion, basically.. >if someone could easily confuse LFO for LFO, >LFO has a case.
Still, it's amusing to think that loads of kids are piling into their record shops, keen to pick up the latest Lyte Funky Ones CD, only to walk out of the shop with 'Frequencies' or 'Advance'. Then again, if those same kids had some sense, they might actually end up preferring it. I don't think Warp will do anything. It'll be more beneficial for them should any mix-up occur. Ie, a Lyte Funky Ones fan is more likely to get confused than an LFO fan. And if this confusion causes Lyte Funk Ones' label to get annoyed, Warp can just give them the finger. -- Mark Stevens http://www.sonance.demon.co.uk/