Who are you and where are you from? If you were African-American and lived
in Chicago, you might not like Footwork either, but I doubt you'd belittle
the entire genre. You're allowed your opinion, but your reaction rubbed me
the wrong way; you made it sound like the people making that music were
getting away with something.
I don't live in Chicago but I go their a fair amount and know the music
scene there fairly well; the one thing I know is that it's serious, and
highly competitive. No one gets away with making mediocre music; any
Footwork tracks you're likely to hear released on e.g. Planet Mu is not
going to be half-assed. You may not like it, it may not speak to your
condition, but to criticize it that way makes me think you're just hearing
it, not listening to it.
And you're under no obligation to like it or listen to it. There's too much
music and life's too short to listen to things you don't enjoy.
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 12:41 PM Jared Dunne <22tape@gmail.com> wrote:
quoted 117 lines "To say "The genre that sounds like some kid forgot to add a snare to his
> "To say "The genre that sounds like some kid forgot to add a snare to his
> half-assed Fruity Loops rap instrumental" is to dismiss a whole musical
> culture based on a very shallow listening experience, and no understanding
> of the culture in which it grew up."
>
> Careful, silly-pants Kent, you're walking the ignorant line yourself, and
> sounding like an academic from the burbs who's just trying to relate. You
> don't know me or where I'm from. If I'm from the same musical culture and
> the same socio-economic background as most peeps who make Footwork, am I
> still ignorant and shallow? Am I allowed to have an opinion then? Good,
> because I am. And most Footwork sucks. And I don't have to put "IMO"
> because I am the one saying it, and it's obviously my opinion. I much
> prefer Bluegrass.
>
> Now, hugs all around!
>
> On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 10:38 AM, kent williams <chaircrusher@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Every genre defines conventions. Every genre, furthermore demands a
>> different sort of listening if you're going to understand and enjoy it. To
>> say "The genre that sounds like some kid forgot to add a snare to his
>> half-assed Fruity Loops rap instrumental" is to dismiss a whole musical
>> culture based on a very shallow listening experience, and no understanding
>> of the culture in which it grew up.
>>
>> Juke/Footwork music is very much the product of kids with cracked copies
>> of Fruity Loops; they work with the tools they have. The motivation was to
>> make music whose purpose is to accompany footwork dancing, which is
>> competetive, athletic and intense. The idea is to have the freshest,
>> trickiest rhythm, often played back on shitty boomboxes or Frankenstein
>> sound systems.. Footwork, like Jit in Detroit, is both dance and stylized
>> warfare; it sublimates the violence and frustration of life in "Chiraq."
>> It is something positive in an environment where people are confronted
>> daily with unrelenting negative things.
>>
>> There's a billion footwork tracks and thousands of people making it.
>> Inevitably most of it is not very good, but like any other genre, when it's
>> good it's great.
>>
>> It's OK not to like musical styles. I bet you're not so hot on bluegrass
>> music as well. But like my grandmother always told me about cream corn,
>> "it's better to say you don't care for it than say you hate it."
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:26 PM David Bohan <madvlad00@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Kent,
>>>
>>> Why does Jared have to be ignorant to not like Footwork? It seems like
>>> Jared just thinks this kind of music does not require much effort or much
>>> of it is the same.
>>>
>>> I listened to the compilation album "Bangs & Works Vol. 1" and have
>>> found his sentiment to be true for most of the tracks on that release, with
>>> some exceptions of course.
>>>
>>> Now Jlin's release here is much more experimental and fresh sounding
>>> than the long tracks of TV show themes spread out over lazy beats.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 1:23 PM, Jared Dunne <22tape@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Ignorant or silly? Either way, I can't help myself, Kent! Honestly,
>>>> Jlin's stuff isn't that bad. But for some reason it all sounds a bit
>>>> unfinished to me. But if peeps want to call it minimal, so be it!
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 12:18 PM, kent williams <chaircrusher@gmail.com
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Jared, stop being ignorant.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:04 AM Jared Dunne <22tape@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ah yes, Footwork. The genre that sounds like some kid forgot to add
>>>>>> a snare to his half-assed Fruity Loops rap instrumental. Yay world!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:51 AM, David Bohan <madvlad00@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I haven't heard of "Footwork"... is this a new genre of music or
>>>>>>> something?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The tracks you linked to sound interesting to say the least. Find it
>>>>>>> also curious that Jlin works at a steel mill in Gary, Indiana... Not much
>>>>>>> music prides itself on coming from Indiana
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 11:29 AM, kent williams <
>>>>>>> chaircrusher@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm surprised footwork/juke hasn't been a bigger thing on the IDM
>>>>>>>> list. This new record on Planet Mu is revelatory.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.planet.mu/discography/ZIQ356
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> 22tape/jared dunne
>>>>>> listen <http://22tape.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> 22tape/jared dunne
>>>> listen <http://22tape.com>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
> --
> 22tape/jared dunne
> listen <http://22tape.com>
>