Re: (idm) Necessary IDM albums /Thoughts on Ischemic folks
Msg-Id:
<26.106b7e0.25b6ba79@aol.com>
Mbox:
idm.0001.gz
In a message dated 19/01/00 9:26:01 AeOtaku writes:
quoted 12 lines Fact: Ischemic Folks is (cut)> Fact: Ischemic Folks is (cut)
>
> That's pretty sad.
> Can I vote that for future IDM polls we assemble
> some sort of panel of people who bought 90% of the
> important albums of the year? Not that I qualify,
> but it seems it'd be more accurate that way. People
> like Lance, Duke, etc. are more in the position to
> vote for what was best when they heard all the contenders.
> I mean, film awards, Nobel Prizes, etc. are all determined
> by a commitee, not a mass vote.
>
Remember that this is a *people's* vote, that's why anyone (without
restrictions) can send their vote in - not an exclusive expert's vote, if it
was it might not be representative. Of course we could have a people's vote
and an experts vote separately. In no instance have I specified that this is
a *definitive* poll. Just one that might reflect the votes of *all* who have
sent them in. Would it also be sad that Solvent and Autechre's EP 7 is
polling as well?
A_Zed
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org