no. One rehab at a time please.
quoted 67 lines -----Original Message-----
> -----Original Message-----
> From: david.knight@schenkerusa.com
> [mailto:david.knight@schenkerusa.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 3:31 PM
> To: John Reading
> Subject: RE: [idm] Indie Ethics
>
>
> John,
>
> Are you offering me a free record also?
>
> Thanks (if so)..David
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: john.reading [mailto:john.reading@us.didata.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 12:17 PM
> To: idm
> Subject: RE: [idm] Indie Ethics
>
>
> LOL!
>
> You used the "OK"
>
>
> Quote:
>
> > The legitimacy of the present copyright structure is integral
> > to the issue of whether it's okay to download music for
> free or not.
>
> The quote is still in error, just like downloading music for free is.
> Take the copyright away and the ownership remains as does the theft.
>
> That free record offer still stands, you need a cd or record player
> though.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pixilated [mailto:pixilated@alum.dartmouth.org]
>
> >
> >
> > Do you understand the meaning of legitimacy? The issue of
> downloading
> > music for free is only an issue because of the construction
> > of ownership
> > of that music. It seems to me that you are using "okay" in
> > terms of some
> > transcendent moral standard from which it would follow that
> if someone
> > produces a musical work, he should get paid for it if he wants to be
> > paid for its use since it's his. This begs the question of
> *ownership*
> > of that music in whatever form. (This is an example of petitio
> > principii.)
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
>
>
>
>