sorry mate, but nothing you've said has any meaning to the issue of
people not paying for their music...
You can throw the complicated "free airwaves, copyrighted pants pants"
all day it is doesn't mean shit really.
Your sounding as bad as that "Mira Calix and Warp are sexist 'cause when
I look at her I get a tickle in my shorts" guy.
quoted 38 lines -----Original Message-----
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pixilated [mailto:pixilated@Alum.Dartmouth.ORG]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 1:49 PM
> To: idm@hyperreal.org
> Subject: RE: [idm] Indie Ethics
>
>
> You think like a slave, and I am using "think" very loosely.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Reading [mailto:john.reading@us.didata.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 1:42 PM
> To: idm@hyperreal.org
> Subject: RE: [idm] Indie Ethics
>
> What a complicated way of saying nothing...
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: pixilated [mailto:pixilated@Alum.Dartmouth.ORG]
>
> >
> > You're saying you, the author, own the idea of a song, not just a
> > physical representation of it. If this ownership is
> legitimate, then
> > no one may possess an MP3 representation of the song without
> > your consent.
> > If it isn't, then someone may, regardless of your consent or lack
> > thereof. Either way you're not laying out any money to
> produce the MP3
> > version. Oh, yeah, and eat a bag of dicks, cretin.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
>
>