Hi everyone,
Sorry for the large email, but as anyone who's posted anything in the last
few days has noticed, this email address below is dead and bouncing
everything back.
Can the list admins (helloo???) please put him on a "don't receive mail"
block or remove him?
Thanks, and sorry. The only reason I'm sending this on to the list is so
that others see that something's been said. My apologies to those of you
offended.
Derek
quoted 90 lines Resent-Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 21:29:03 -0800 (PST)
>Resent-Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 21:29:03 -0800 (PST)
>Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 21:29:03 -0800 (PST)
>X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.546)
>Auto-Submitted: auto-generated (failure)
>Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
>From: postoffice@orngca-mls01.socal.rr.com
>To: EggyToast <eggy@eggytoast.com>
>Resent-From: sabercid@san.rr.com
>X-RCPT-TO: <eggy@eggytoast.com>
>
>The original message was received at 2002-11-01 21:26:15 -0800
>from postoffice.local. [10.0.0.1]
>
> ----- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -----
><sabercid@san.rr.com>
>
> -----Transcript of session follows -----
>... while talking to postoffice.local..:
> >>> RCPT To:<sabercid@san.rr.com>
><<< 550 5.1.1 unknown or illegal alias: sabercid@san.rr.com
>550 <sabercid@san.rr.com>... User unknown
>Reporting-MTA: dns; postoffice.local.
>Received-From-MTA: DNS; postoffice.local.
>Arrival-Date: 2002-11-01 21:26:15 -0800
>
>Final-Recipient: RFC822; sabercid@san.rr.com
>Action: failed
>Status: 5.1.1
>Remote-MTA: DNS; postoffice.local.
>Diagnostic-Code: SMTP;550 5.1.1 unknown or illegal alias: sabercid@san.rr.com
>Last-Attempt-Date: 2002-11-01 21:26:15 -0800
>Return-Path: <idm-return-57897-sabercid=san.rr.com@hyperreal.org>
>Received: from lamx01.mgw.rr.com ([66.75.160.12]) by pop1.san.rr.com
> (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223
> ID# 0-59787U250000L250000S0V35) with ESMTP id com
> for <sabercid@san.rr.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 07:40:26 -0800
>Received: from hyperreal.org (taz3.hyperreal.org [209.237.226.90])
> by lamx01.mgw.rr.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with SMTP id gA1FeP5H013162
> for <sabercid@san.rr.com>; Fri, 1 Nov 2002 10:40:25 -0500 (EST)
>Received: (qmail 61686 invoked by uid 1153); 1 Nov 2002 15:40:17 -0000
>Mailing-List: contact idm-help@hyperreal.org; run by ezmlm
>Precedence: bulk
>X-No-Archive: yes
>list-help: <mailto:idm-help@hyperreal.org>
>list-unsubscribe: <mailto:idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org>
>list-post: <mailto:idm@hyperreal.org>
>Delivered-To: mailing list idm@hyperreal.org
>Received: (qmail 61545 invoked from network); 1 Nov 2002 15:40:08 -0000
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>X-Sender: eggy@eggytoast.com@mail.eggytoast.com
>Message-Id: <a05010403b9e850e9a1cc@[128.220.50.51]>
>In-Reply-To:
> <Pine.GSO.3.95-960729.1021101152331.14420A-100000@bach.dur.ac.uk>
>References:
> <Pine.GSO.3.95-960729.1021101152331.14420A-100000@bach.dur.ac.uk>
>Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2002 10:41:00 -0500
>To: idm@hyperreal.org
>From: EggyToast <eggy@eggytoast.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
>X-Spam-Rating: taz3.hyperreal.org 1.6.2 0/1000/N
>Subject: Re: [idm] Future of IDM
>
>>On Fri, 1 Nov 2002, Mxyzptlk wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >On Wednesday, October 30, 2002, at 08:54 AM, James WHITE wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>Hello. I was just wondering where everyone sees IDM going in the near
>>> >>future? I mean sound/genre - anything really. Just interested in hearing
>>> >>some opinions.
>>>
>>> Boy band/girl group type ensembles ala Destiny's Child
>>
>>
>>Ah, girl/boy bands :-)
>
>girl on boy bands :)
>
>derek
>--
>eggytoast.com
>--------------
>you'll shoot your eye out
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
>For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
>