179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

[idm] idm and replication (was Re: Ae Peel Session 2)

4 messages · 3 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
◇ merged from 2 subjects: ae peel session 2 · idm and replication (was re: ae peel session 2)
2000-10-23 06:08X F [idm] Re: Ae Peel Session 2
2000-10-23 07:06Re: [idm] Re: Ae Peel Session 2
2000-10-23 07:30{{{5x}}} Re: [idm] Re: Ae Peel Session 2
2000-10-23 08:14{{{5x}}} [idm] idm and replication (was Re: Ae Peel Session 2)
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2000-10-23 06:08X F>> It's like they totally ran out of ideas after >>Chiastic Slide. >> With the exception o
From:
X F
To:
Date:
Sun, 22 Oct 2000 23:08:52 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
[idm] Re: Ae Peel Session 2
permalink · <20001023060852.1911.qmail@web3904.mail.yahoo.com>
quoted 7 lines It's like they totally ran out of ideas after>> It's like they totally ran out of ideas after >>Chiastic Slide. >> With the exception of a couple awesome tracks (corc >>and outpt), the last two major releases have been >>really boring, tedious affairs. > >I bet you equate "ideas" with those simple,
melancholy >melodies that used to be prominent in Ae's music.
quoted 2 lines Andrei> >Andrei
As a matter of fact, you're right. But I digress. This is totally a matter of opinion. If you like their newer stuff better, that's cool. I hope they keep putting out records. But I also hope they find a sound that's a little more memorable. Each song on Tri Repetae has its own character and style. Tracks on the new albums (especially EP7) all sound the same to me. I guess they're alright to listen to, but I usually take the cd out after about the eighth or ninth track because it's so damn boring and directionless. They've certainly proven they're influential. There ARE a lot of bands who copy their older sound. But I've heard very little imitation of LP5 or EP7. forcasa __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Messenger - Talk while you surf! It's FREE. http://im.yahoo.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-10-23 07:06andrei@world.std.com{{{5x}}} wrote: > > There ARE a lot of bands who copy their older sound. But > > I've hear
From:
To:
Date:
Mon, 23 Oct 2000 03:06:22 -0400
Subject:
Re: [idm] Re: Ae Peel Session 2
permalink · <39F3E323.3344A86F@world.std.com>
{{{5x}}} wrote:
quoted 6 lines There ARE a lot of bands who copy their older sound. But> > There ARE a lot of bands who copy their older sound. But > > I've heard very little imitation of LP5 or EP7. > > <smartass remark> > it's because they can't > </smartass remark>
You're absolutely right, not smartazz at all. But you know we'll probably start hearing imitations in like 5 years from now when every joe shmoe has finally figured out Max/MSP or finally saved up enough to get a Kyma system or whatever. Andrei --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-10-23 07:30{{{5x}}}> There ARE a lot of bands who copy their older sound. But > I've heard very little imitat
From:
{{{5x}}}
To:
X F
Cc:
Date:
Mon, 23 Oct 2000 01:30:39 -0600
Subject:
Re: [idm] Re: Ae Peel Session 2
permalink · <39F3E91F.958D04C3@home.com>
quoted 2 lines There ARE a lot of bands who copy their older sound. But> There ARE a lot of bands who copy their older sound. But > I've heard very little imitation of LP5 or EP7.
<smartass remark> it's because they can't </smartass remark> =O) -- {{{5x}}} clicking faders so you don't have to --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-10-23 08:14{{{5x}}}> You're absolutely right, not smartazz at all. But you know we'll probably start > hearin
From:
{{{5x}}}
Cc:
Date:
Mon, 23 Oct 2000 02:14:00 -0600
Subject:
[idm] idm and replication (was Re: Ae Peel Session 2)
permalink · <39F3F348.319B1607@home.com>
quoted 3 lines You're absolutely right, not smartazz at all. But you know we'll probably start> You're absolutely right, not smartazz at all. But you know we'll probably start > hearing imitations in like 5 years from now when every joe shmoe has finally figured > out Max/MSP or finally saved up enough to get a Kyma system or whatever.
yeah, that's the thing about electronic evolution i suppose. i remember when i first heard "nannou" i was like.."whoooooaaaaaa" now anyone with an mp3.com page can make a similiar nannou and call it babou or some shit like that. now, i've progressed to a stage where i can process drums like autechre can. whatever eh? i think a debate can now lie in the longevity of the originality of idm. is it bad because it's so easy to emulate now? what does that say? i dunno, you tell me, dudes and dudettes. i'm just trying to offer some fodder -- {{{5x}}} clicking faders so you don't have to --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org