179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

RE: [idm] time signatures (nobody read this, its spam)

3 messages · 3 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
◇ merged from 2 subjects: time signatures · time signatures (nobody read this, its spam)
2000-08-16 20:35brian albers RE: [idm] time signatures
└─ 2000-08-16 21:06Matthew Guest RE: [idm] time signatures
└─ 2000-08-16 21:11Ian Pojman RE: [idm] time signatures (nobody read this, its spam)
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
2000-08-16 20:35brian albersI'm probably the nerdiest music theory guy on here so let me say this: Any time signature
From:
brian albers
To:
Date:
Wed, 16 Aug 2000 20:35:20 GMT
Subject:
RE: [idm] time signatures
permalink · <LAW-F271ZUTq8DTOWrV00001fa5@hotmail.com>
I'm probably the nerdiest music theory guy on here so let me say this: Any time signature can sound like just about any other because there is nothing that says you've got to put the kick drum sound on the first downbeat or any of the downbeats for that matter. If you superimpose nothing but quarter note triplets into a 4/4 pattern, its gonna sound like 3/4. Then again, you don't even have to incorporate a traditional time pattern. Exhibit A: Autechre's "Rpeg" or many things from Lp5 or the Anti-Ep. Don't make me explain coupled duplets or triplets...
quoted 4 lines to be a total music nerd...>to be a total music nerd... > >4/4 CAN sound like 6/8 if you play it "swingy" enough >--
________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-08-16 21:06Matthew GuestThank goodness this is the IDM list. If the music had vocals, we'd all be sucked into like
From:
Matthew Guest
To:
Intelligent Dance Music
Date:
Wed, 16 Aug 2000 16:06:41 -0500
Subject:
RE: [idm] time signatures
Reply to:
RE: [idm] time signatures
permalink · <DAEFKBEFOPLBBENJDGMDGEMKCCAA.mguest@alphagraphics.com>
Thank goodness this is the IDM list. If the music had vocals, we'd all be sucked into like threads about aural theory... eeek.... ;) -matT --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
2000-08-16 21:11Ian Pojmandude it does have vocals :P but yeah you get what you ask for posting to a buch of geeks l
From:
Ian Pojman
To:
Date:
Wed, 16 Aug 2000 16:11:41 -0500
Subject:
RE: [idm] time signatures (nobody read this, its spam)
Reply to:
RE: [idm] time signatures
permalink · <GNENLFEHEAMCLLIMHOOHEEABCAAA.ian@webice.net>
dude it does have vocals :P but yeah you get what you ask for posting to a buch of geeks like me. -----Original Message----- From: Matthew Guest [mailto:mguest@alphagraphics.com] Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2000 4:07 PM To: Intelligent Dance Music Subject: RE: [idm] time signatures Thank goodness this is the IDM list. If the music had vocals, we'd all be sucked into like threads about aural theory... eeek.... ;) -matT --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org