179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes
Search · subject · body · from · to
Advanced search
reset

← archive index

Re: (idm) mask400

3 messages · 3 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1998-11-14 15:43jason amm (idm) mask400
└─ 1998-11-14 18:23Mark Stevens Re: (idm) mask400
1998-11-15 16:48Re: (idm) mask400
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1998-11-14 15:43jason ammhello can anyone confirm (as opposed to speculate) for me who did track2 on mask400 ["mask
From:
jason amm
To:
Date:
Sat, 14 Nov 1998 11:43:35 -0400
Subject:
(idm) mask400
permalink · <v01550101b2735234cd57@[207.34.203.202]>
hello can anyone confirm (as opposed to speculate) for me who did track2 on mask400 ["mask400" label side]. it's the track before push button objects. it's been narrowed down to either post, ld runners, or sonic beat alliance. please reply in private. thankyougoodbye jason
1998-11-14 18:23Mark StevensOn Sat, 14 Nov 1998 11:43:35 -0400, you wrote: >can anyone confirm (as opposed to speculat
From:
Mark Stevens
To:
Cc:
jason amm
Date:
Sat, 14 Nov 1998 18:23:54 GMT
Subject:
Re: (idm) mask400
Reply to:
(idm) mask400
permalink · <364dc951.670638@post.demon.co.uk>
On Sat, 14 Nov 1998 11:43:35 -0400, you wrote:
quoted 2 lines can anyone confirm (as opposed to speculate) for me who did track2 on>can anyone confirm (as opposed to speculate) for me who did track2 on >mask400 ["mask400" label side].
Gescom.
quoted 2 lines it's the track before push button objects. it's been narrowed down to>it's the track before push button objects. it's been narrowed down to >either post, ld runners, or sonic beat alliance.
Hmm, unless our labels have been printed the wrong way round (which has been known to happen with Skam -- ie, Gescom's 'This'), I wouldn't think so. The second track on my "mask400" label side has got Booth/Brown hallmarks all over it. Still, our labels must be correct, seeing as the track following it has got to be Push Button Objects. Personally, I'm pretty sure that the artists *are* listed in the order they appear on the record, assuming you start from LD Runners. /\/)ark http://www.sonance.demon.co.uk/
1998-11-15 16:48thatcat@ix.netcom.comOn 11/14/98 18:23:54 you wrote: >>can anyone confirm (as opposed to speculate) for me who
From:
To:
Date:
Sun, 15 Nov 1998 10:48:26 -0600 (CST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) mask400
permalink · <19981115123211141@ix.netcom.com>
On 11/14/98 18:23:54 you wrote:
quoted 16 lines can anyone confirm (as opposed to speculate) for me who did track2 on>>can anyone confirm (as opposed to speculate) for me who did track2 on >>mask400 ["mask400" label side]. > >Gescom. > >>it's the track before push button objects. it's been narrowed down to >>either post, ld runners, or sonic beat alliance. > >Hmm, unless our labels have been printed the wrong way round (which >has been known to happen with Skam -- ie, Gescom's 'This'), I wouldn't >think so. The second track on my "mask400" label side has got >Booth/Brown hallmarks all over it. Still, our labels must be correct, >seeing as the track following it has got to be Push Button Objects. > >Personally, I'm pretty sure that the artists *are* listed in the order >they appear on the record, assuming you start from LD Runners.
they're not at all...the first track on the "mask400" side is by while. the last track on the side with the names is gescom. hence the second track is one of the three bands mentioned above... "a dream is worth a thousand pictures, the mouths of lampreys a thousand more..."