179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) correction...markant#'s 11&12

2 messages · 2 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1998-08-18 19:02Christopher J LaRose (idm) correction...markant#'s 11&12
1998-08-18 19:13Shane Cantwell Re: (idm) correction...markant#'s 11&12
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1998-08-18 19:02Christopher J LaRosesorry, it was markant #'s 11 and 12 i was asking after, not 12 & 13... now that i've gotte
From:
Christopher J LaRose
To:
idm
Date:
Tue, 18 Aug 1998 15:02:25 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:
(idm) correction...markant#'s 11&12
permalink · <Pine.OSF.3.95.980818150006.31860A-100000@is5.nyu.edu>
sorry, it was markant #'s 11 and 12 i was asking after, not 12 & 13... now that i've gotten the spotters all flustered. chris
1998-08-18 19:13Shane CantwellI've only listened to them a couple of times, but they're...alright. I don't really see th
From:
Shane Cantwell
To:
Christopher J LaRose , idm
Date:
Tue, 18 Aug 1998 13:13:21 -0600
Subject:
Re: (idm) correction...markant#'s 11&12
permalink · <001a01bdcadc$457bd080$04a50c26@shane>
I've only listened to them a couple of times, but they're...alright. I don't really see the big deal that supposedly surrounds these - nothing Autechre hasn't done, IMO. Were the earlier ones actually groundbreaking in any way?
quoted 3 lines sorry, it was markant #'s 11 and 12 i was asking after, not 12 & 13...>sorry, it was markant #'s 11 and 12 i was asking after, not 12 & 13... >now that i've gotten the spotters all flustered. >chris