179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

Re: (idm) Trade etiquette

3 messages · 3 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1997-12-23 00:41jeff (idm) Trade etiquette
└─ 1997-12-23 01:17Aran M. Parillo Re: (idm) Trade etiquette
1997-12-23 02:09PUCKERED1 Re: Re: (idm) Trade etiquette
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1997-12-23 00:41jeffQuestion : If a person is to sell you some cds in a mail deal and ostensibly agrees to do
From:
jeff
To:
Date:
Mon, 22 Dec 1997 19:41:59 -0500
Subject:
(idm) Trade etiquette
permalink · <349F08D6.DE68B0D7@flash.net>
Question : If a person is to sell you some cds in a mail deal and ostensibly agrees to do the deal quick - then, for some unexplained reason doesn't respond to repeated emails after your cheque has cleared the bank, how long does one wait before posting a warning to other IDMers? Keep in mind that the mail is slow this time of year and people are busire than usual, although that certainly wouldn't prevent them from replying to the mail...especially when they are posting to the IDM list in the same timeframe. And if you're reading this, you know who you are. No names...yet. I'll be as fair as I think appropriate. It's not polite to leave folks hanging, though. All I ask is for a reason NOT to fear the worst. jeff
1997-12-23 01:17Aran M. ParilloOn Mon, 22 Dec 1997, jeff wrote: > Question : If a person is to sell you some cds in a mai
From:
Aran M. Parillo
To:
jeff
Cc:
Date:
Mon, 22 Dec 1997 17:17:04 -0800 (PST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Trade etiquette
Reply to:
(idm) Trade etiquette
permalink · <Pine.BSF.3.96.971222170750.28918A-100000@taz.hyperreal.org>
On Mon, 22 Dec 1997, jeff wrote:
quoted 5 lines Question : If a person is to sell you some cds in a mail deal and> Question : If a person is to sell you some cds in a mail deal and > ostensibly agrees to do the deal quick - then, for some unexplained > reason doesn't respond to repeated emails after your cheque has cleared > the bank, how long does one wait before posting a warning to other > IDMers? Keep in mind that the mail is slow this time of year and people
Glad to see you're using your discretion with regard to such matters, after all some jerkfaces even call people out as 'potential' bad traders WHEN in fact THEY HAVE NEVER EVEN TRADED WITH THEM!!!! (Funny huh!) But seriously, I think, with regard to net-deals-protocol, once the check has been cached [sik] you're entitled to *at least* a reply via email with an update on the sellers status. State the _facts_ and you'll never be at fault. Teep np: share the fall
1997-12-23 02:09PUCKERED1it's not me! ;) at least you are cool enough to hold your composure about such matters...
From:
PUCKERED1
To:
Cc:
Date:
Mon, 22 Dec 1997 21:09:22 EST
Subject:
Re: Re: (idm) Trade etiquette
permalink · <9662c3ca.349f1d54@aol.com>
it's not me! ;) at least you are cool enough to hold your composure about such matters... although the person should at least email you back if they are in fact still posting to IDM. I could see if maybe the person was home for the holidays or something, but... np: ifach vol.1 In a message dated 12/22/97 8:18:20 PM, aran@hyperreal.org wrote:
quoted 15 lines Question : If a person is to sell you some cds in a mail deal and>> Question : If a person is to sell you some cds in a mail deal and >> ostensibly agrees to do the deal quick - then, for some unexplained >> reason doesn't respond to repeated emails after your cheque has cleared >> the bank, how long does one wait before posting a warning to other >> IDMers? Keep in mind that the mail is slow this time of year and people > >Glad to see you're using your discretion with regard to such matters, >after all some jerkfaces even call people out as 'potential' bad traders >WHEN in fact THEY HAVE NEVER EVEN TRADED WITH THEM!!!! (Funny huh!) > >But seriously, I think, with regard to net-deals-protocol, once the check >has been cached [sik] you're entitled to *at least* a reply via email with >an update on the sellers status. > >State the _facts_ and you'll never be at fault.