179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) Bowie??

3 messages · 3 participants · spans 1 day · search this subject
1997-02-19 00:54Chris Fahey (idm) Bowie??
├─ 1997-02-18 20:52Nate Re: (idm) Bowie??
└─ 1997-02-19 01:53Mark Kolmar Re: (idm) Bowie??
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1997-02-19 00:54Chris FaheySo, anyway, what's with this new Bowie album Earthling? I haven't heard it, but occasional
From:
Chris Fahey
To:
'IDM'
Date:
Tue, 18 Feb 1997 19:54:01 -0500
Subject:
(idm) Bowie??
permalink · <416943A58039D011A85200A0C925CC73089A52@AQUAMARINE>
So, anyway, what's with this new Bowie album Earthling? I haven't heard it, but occasionally people mention it on this list as if it were relevant to idm. Has he reinvented himself as "µ-Ziq-y Stardust" or what?
1997-02-18 20:52NateFrom a layman's point of view, his new album is a crazy trip into Bowies's infamous mind f
From:
Nate
To:
Chris Fahey
Cc:
'IDM'
Date:
Tue, 18 Feb 1997 20:52:49 +0000 ()
Subject:
Re: (idm) Bowie??
Reply to:
(idm) Bowie??
permalink · <Pine.BSF.3.95.970218204730.6569C-100000@www.webelite.com>
From a layman's point of view, his new album is a crazy trip into Bowies's infamous mind fueled by aggressive guitars and eerie pulsing electronic drums...a hit I'm sure From an IDM standpoint, a bland rock-n-roll album that is a total d&b rip-off. This stuff is actually worse than the NIN song because Bowie (or whoever produced the album) doesn't even bother trying to play/tweak the rhythms or anything. The breakbeat loops are simply monotonous filler. This CD is the rage where I work... Nate Harrison Digital Magician Inc. www.digimagician.com nate@digimagician.com On Tue, 18 Feb 1997, Chris Fahey wrote:
quoted 5 lines So, anyway, what's with this new Bowie album Earthling? I haven't heard> So, anyway, what's with this new Bowie album Earthling? I haven't heard > it, but occasionally people mention it on this list as if it were > relevant to idm. Has he reinvented himself as "?-Ziq-y Stardust" or > what? >
1997-02-19 01:53Mark KolmarBowie has always been more of a popularizer than an innovator; and usually pointing toward
From:
Mark Kolmar
To:
Chris Fahey
Cc:
'IDM'
Date:
Tue, 18 Feb 1997 19:53:25 -0600 (CST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Bowie??
Reply to:
(idm) Bowie??
permalink · <Pine.SOL.3.95.970218192942.5516A-100000@typhoon>
Bowie has always been more of a popularizer than an innovator; and usually pointing toward the past or into the future, and often both. Yes, during the 80's he lapsed into self-derivative mediocrity, but I think you have to give the guy a lot of credit for not being complacent nowadays and not wanting to stand still. Not many artists, to this point, have blended jungle rhythms with rock or pop songs. In Bowie's case (_Earthling_) I think the result is a blend, not a collision. He's made a career of jumping on the latest fashion train, not riding it too long before moving on to the next thing that catches his ear. _Young Americans_ popularized the new disco sound for a rock audience, well before Disco Fever struck. I hear that Ziggy fans were PISSED. I don't want to give a chronology of Bowie's whole career. Certainly many people would be far more qualified than I. The point is, I hear _Earthling_ as a very "1997" record for him to have made. Whether you were expecting something different, or you don't like Bowie at all, I'm quite sure he caused similar quarrels and objections 20 years ago and earlier. --Mark __ <http://www.xnet.com/~mkolmar/BurningRome> ==> MPEG audio clips <== m u s i c : w e b : s o u n d d e s i g n : h t m l : c g i : e t c "We invented machines in order to reduce our work. Now that we have them, we think we should go on working." (John Cage) On Tue, 18 Feb 1997, Chris Fahey wrote:
quoted 5 lines So, anyway, what's with this new Bowie album Earthling? I haven't heard> So, anyway, what's with this new Bowie album Earthling? I haven't heard > it, but occasionally people mention it on this list as if it were > relevant to idm. Has he reinvented himself as "?-Ziq-y Stardust" or > what? >