179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← archive index

(idm) The Rise and Rise of Warphlex

1 message · 1 participant · spans 1 day · search this subject
1996-10-23 09:34RwH (idm) The Rise and Rise of Warphlex
expand allcollapse allclick any summary to toggle that message
1996-10-23 09:34RwHHi Folks, I don't think anyone who has been listening carefully can say that a 'fall' is o
From:
RwH
To:
Date:
Wed, 23 Oct 1996 09:34:44 GMT
Subject:
(idm) The Rise and Rise of Warphlex
permalink · <D214B73410@arts-01.novell.leeds.ac.uk>
Hi Folks, I don't think anyone who has been listening carefully can say that a 'fall' is on the cards for Warp. I agree with those who relish the widening in style that has been signalled by recent releases. Shit, all that bass and bleep stuff back at the beginning was cool (I'll never forget seeing 'LFO' by LFO on Top of the Pops and thinking 'What the fuck was that???') but a lot has happened since then. The way I see it Warp has always attempted to cover the stylish part of the cutting edge. Back then that meant blowing speakers and jumping needles, now that means Squarepusher, Slazenger, Aphex, Freeform, Tenor, Red Snapper etc., etc. We should be grateful that the label still means 'cool and bang up to the minute'. Whilst I'm on the subject, RePHLeX is doing easily as good a job. The quality of a label should not be judged on how successfully it replicates the sound of its early recordings. The "identity" of a label, if you must define it, should be something to do with how it expands whilst following a guiding philosophy. I love the byline I saw in a recent RePHLeX advert: (something like) "releasing records so you don't have to waste your money on shit". Exactly! love, Rob ;-)