| Date | From | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| 2003-02-0521:07 | Brandon Smith <gozravp@yahoo.com> | [idm] OT: Invisibility. Japanese Scientist invents invisibility cloak.
http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm… |
| 2003-02-0521:23 | Maximilien Lincourt <maximilien.lincourt@mayahtt.com> | RE: [idm] OT: Invisibility. I don't get it, looks more like a optical trick than… |
| 2003-02-0523:43 | seeklektek <eclectic@attbi.com> | Re: [idm] OT: Invisibility.
From: "Dan Haskovec"
> But the trick here is mostly (if not totally… |
| 2003-02-0521:20 | Marco Carbone <mcarbone@eecs.harvard.edu> | RE: [idm] OT: Invisibility. > I don't get it, looks more like a optical trick than… |
| 2003-02-0521:36 | EggyToast <eggy@eggytoast.com> | RE: [idm] OT: Invisibility. >> I don't get it, looks more like a optical trick than… |
| 2003-02-0523:38 | Dan Haskovec <dan@pry.com> | RE: [idm] OT: Invisibility. But the trick here is mostly (if not totally) in the viewfinder… |
| 2003-02-0617:12 | iteration zero <iterationzero@hotmail.com> | RE: [idm] OT: Invisibility. >From: Matt Jarsky |
| 2003-02-0614:33 | iteration zero <iterationzero@hotmail.com> | RE: [idm] OT: Invisibility. >>> I don't get it, looks more like a optical trick than… |
| 2003-02-0615:33 | Matt Jarsky <studio@cheapo.cc> | RE: [idm] OT: Invisibility. then there are all the hazards of your own behaviour, based on… |