| Date | From | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| 1996-06-2519:30 | Lazlo Nibble <lazlo@swcp.com> | (idm) Re: Organic '96 review > The most surprising thing was to see Thrash at the controls again… |
| 1996-06-2900:02 | <AWerks2@aol.com> | Re: (idm) Organic '96 review that's wrong cause they
have a variety of singles as well… |
| 1996-06-2720:40 | James B Gill <jgill@U.Arizona.EDU> | Re: (idm) Organic '96 review: Chemicals What are you talking about??!! Not excited to be there, I disagree… |
| 1996-06-2814:57 | Dan Smith <robi@tiger.coe.missouri.edu> | Re: (idm) Organic '96 review > You mentioned that they play
> basically the same set. What do you… |
| 1996-06-2911:02 | James B Gill <jgill@U.Arizona.EDU> | Re: (idm) Organic '96 review On Fri, 28 Jun 1996, Dan Smith wrote:
> > You mentioned that they… |
| 1996-06-2823:55 | William L Samuels <wls@U.Arizona.EDU> | Re: (idm) Organic '96 review On Fri, 28 Jun 1996, Dan Smith wrote:
> No, the Chem Bros… |
| 1996-06-2900:40 | William L Samuels <wls@U.Arizona.EDU> | (idm) Re: Organic '96 review Fri, 28 Jun 1996, Tamara Palmer wrote:
> I'm just saying that… |
| 1996-06-2718:02 | Tamara Palmer <trance@netcom.com> | Re: (idm) Organic '96 review Pete Ashdown said:
> The Chemical Brothers arrived and promptly kicked everyone's… |
| 1996-06-2817:25 | Tamara Palmer <trance@netcom.com> | (idm) Re: Organic '96 review William Samuels, my new favorite buddy, politely replied:
> before and they were… |