| Date | From | Subject |
|---|---|---|
| 2001-08-2312:27 | John Bush <johbus@allmusic.com> | RE: [idm] Allmusic/Confield > Or maybe whoever wrote that is just some
> soulless fuck who can… |
| 2001-04-2402:24 | Peter Schrock <pachinko74@mac.com> | Re: [idm] ae's confield on 4/23/01 12:13 AM, teardropb . at boygothic@hotmail.com… |
| 2001-06-0707:11 | <jetjag@paradise.net.nz> | [idm] Just gave 'Confield' a listen... ...and don't really hear how it's supposed to be cold… |
| 2001-10-1307:32 | Ebola 3 <andylists@hotmail.com> | Re: [idm] Confield
>
>Right, well, I'm just wondering how a listener would distinguish
>this… |
| 2001-04-2420:17 | Peter Schrock <pachinko74@mac.com> | Re: [idm] ae's confield on 4/24/01 9:42 AM, Lander at gamera_@yahoo.com… |
| 2001-04-2201:02 | Vector Audax <audax@mb.sympatico.ca> | Re: [idm] CONFIeLD/Demand for explanation fom SEAN&ROB My only reason for saying they were shotty is that, when I… |
| 2001-03-2902:01 | component <component@mindstorm.com> | Re: [idm] Confield Release Date Delayed...Of Course Wasn't some of the other warp stuff out also pushed back… |
| 2001-05-0610:24 | The Chisa <matt@holland.deathhouse.net> | Re: [idm] Confield
Appropriate.
m@2zo
www.thechisa.com
"Like David said in the 23rd… |
| 2001-06-0716:23 | philippe petit <philippe-petit@wanadoo.fr> | Re: [idm] Just gave 'Confield' a listen... > >
> > but "pop music" means exactly that! POPular music!
> > soooo, what is the… |
| 2001-04-2121:10 | djgyn forever <djgyn@yahoo.com> | [idm] Re: was CONFIeLD/Demand now SAWII > From: Brian MacDonald |
| 2001-10-1304:03 | EggyToast <youn0394@umn.edu> | Re: [idm] Confield At 11:16 PM 10/12/2001 +0000, you wrote:
>There is… |
| 2001-05-2514:02 | Maximilien Lincourt <max@toonboom.com> | RE: [idm] Confield review in the Washington Post I haven't listened to Confield yet, but I think the review… |
| 2001-04-2109:24 | teardropb . <boygothic@hotmail.com> | Re: [idm] CONFIeLD/Demand for explanation fom SEAN&ROB R E P E A T !
this is not a joke, we… |
| 2001-03-0319:41 | César Laia <cesar.laia@netvisao.pt> | Re: [idm] autechre-confield Not completely useless. There are interesting names, like "vi scose poise".
Does… |
| 2001-04-2416:57 | Niall Murphy <nimurphy@hotmail.com> | Re: [idm] ae's confield on the subject of the purpose of this discussion list i couldnt… |
| 2001-10-1311:20 | Mark F. <mef@ecst.csuchico.edu> | Re: [idm] Confield and Matthew Ritchie Actually, some of his stuff looks exactly like the cover art to… |
| 2001-04-0320:16 | Joyrex <joyrex@ev1.net> | Re: [idm] Autechre's new album "Confield" The AE album was pushed back to 30 April due to pressing… |
| 2001-03-0518:40 | Gause, Brian <bgause@SECTORBASE.COM> | RE: [idm] autechre-confield or maybe the AE boys are playing with changing tracknames around like… |
| 2001-04-2416:25 | teardropb . <boygothic@hotmail.com> | Re: [idm] ae's confield >just cause you dont like music doesnt mean it's shit. if… |
| 2001-10-1223:29 | :m. zero <mzero@ecesis.org> | Re: [idm] Confield > fractal. i think in the future, this will be done in real… |
| 2001-05-0823:36 | Rob Salit <rsalit@nyc.rr.com> | [idm] Confield (not a review) I'm not even going to attempt to give my review of… |
| 2001-05-0100:40 | Charles R. Terhune <chuck0@cfom-music.com> | Re: [idm] Confield is a natural(sic) progression I would agree from hearing jus the one track.
LP5 makes perfect… |
| 2002-07-2323:47 | ugly and mean <ugly_and_mean@yahoo.com> | RE: [idm] Ae's progression (Amber vs. Confield)
--- Sean Horton |
| 2001-08-3101:10 | Brian MacDonald <brianm@kuci.org> | [idm] confield locked grooves(?)
Aaaaaah kay.... well, this all sorta recalls an ol' college radio war… |
| 2001-04-2308:13 | teardropb . <boygothic@hotmail.com> | Re: [idm] ae's confield
>I liken the emotion of, say, Boards of Canada, to sitting on… |
| 2001-03-0617:17 | <TekDz9ER@aol.com> | [idm] Confield - Hysterical Crap I love it how people on this list find things to argue… |
| 2001-05-1706:50 | zimbo <tofu@falco.kuci.uci.edu> | Re: [idm] (Flame,Ignore)Autechre 'Confield'
On Thu, 17 May 2001, teardropb . wrote:
> Anyway, my point is you… |
| 2001-06-0708:26 | p h o n k <phonk@galactica.it> | Re: [idm] Just gave 'Confield' a listen...
----- Original Message -----
From: |
| 2001-04-2420:08 | The Chisa <matt@holland.deathhouse.net> | Re: [idm] ae's confield
I have an interview track floating around, in which Sean and Rob… |
| 2001-05-1900:03 | Gilly <galaxey@sdccu.net> | [idm] my first Confield post first time I post any comments on this CD, so lay off… |
| 2001-08-2717:33 | pastel pastel <pastelpastel@hotmail.com> | Re: [idm] Re:Re: [idm] Allmusic/Confield im sorry if you stay in the form and dont understand what… |
| 2001-04-2613:55 | <damek@earthling.net> | RE: [idm] confield > -----Original Message-----
> From: Alex Reynolds [mailto:reynolda@sas.upenn.edu]
> Sent: Thursday… |
| 2001-04-0700:04 | Andrei <andrei@world.std.com> | Re: [idm] Confield on napster? On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, Mark Stevens wrote:
> Here's a reply… |
| 2001-05-2513:41 | Jeffrey Barszcz <glueslabs@home.com> | [idm] Confield review in the Washington Post i saw this in the weekend section of the post while at… |
| 2002-07-2419:01 | david turgeon <david.t@steam.ca> | Re: [idm] Ae's progression (Amber vs. Confield) kiya, & the rest of the idm list,
> > If Autechre continued creating music… |
| 2001-04-2304:56 | EggyToast <youn0394@umn.edu> | Re: [idm] ae's confield
>The trouble many people
>are having with Confield could be that the… |
| 2001-04-2221:46 | Matthew Kirkcaldie <Matthew.Kirkcaldie@utas.edu.au> | [idm] Confield of course >From: Doug |
| 2001-04-2107:37 | teardropb . <boygothic@hotmail.com> | Re: [idm] was CONFIeLD/Demand now SAWII I beg to differ.
SAWII is some of the most beutifull and… |
| 2001-05-0101:04 | Static Beats <static@staticbeats.com> | Re: [idm] where to buy confield in nyc? My copy just arrived in the mail from http://www.warprecords.com… |
| 2001-05-2020:27 | Greg Clow <greg@stainedproductions.com> | Re: [idm] confield domestic v. import At 04:24 PM 5/20/01, Ali Khoobehi wrote:
>does anyone… |
| 2001-04-0614:50 | Brian M. Cass <kingmob@nmt.edu> | Re: [idm] Confield on napster? I'm fiending for ae too, and have been periodically checking for… |
| 2001-05-2519:11 | Aaron D Meyers <adm226@nyu.edu> | Re: RE: [idm] Confield review in the Washington Post Yea... I kinda agree with Jeff here. I sort of got the… |
| 2001-08-3011:32 | anne teh <tehanne@hotmail.com> | Re: [idm] locked grooves on confield
>From: killog123@juno.com
>i bet if you relax and put the… |
| 2001-05-0108:43 | teardropb . <boygothic@hotmail.com> | Re: [idm] Confield is a natural(sic) progression >I would agree from hearing jus the one track.
>
>LP5 makes perfect… |
| 2001-05-0716:20 | Kevin Aiello <kfa1@home.com> | [idm] A Confield Review
I have heard Confield in its entirety twice (once on headphones and… |
| 2001-10-1222:43 | peer <indecentrobotexposure@hotmail.com> | Re: [idm] Confield the generative methods used on confield did not exist for tri repetae… |
| 2001-06-0715:51 | Kurt Hoffman <supine@bway.net> | [idm] Re: [idm-m] Just gave 'Confield' a listen... At 7:11 AM +0000 6/7/01, jetjag@paradise.net.nz… |
| 2001-10-1401:12 | Joseph MacKay <joemackay@accesswave.ca> | Re: [idm] Confield
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin M. Ryan" |
| 2001-08-2717:41 | Adam Piontek <apiontek@yahoo.com> | Re: [idm] Re:Re: [idm] Allmusic/Confield Somebody give this kid an education for Christmas,
please! (Or at least… |
| 2001-08-2320:57 | Anig Browl <anig_browl@yahoo.com> | Re: [idm] Allmusic/Confield From: John Bush |