179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
dj pie
To:
Lukas Bergstrom
Cc:
idm doesn't stand for anything
Date:
Mon, 24 Jun 2002 14:52:15 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
Re: [idm] permission slips
Msg-Id:
<Pine.LNX.4.31L2.0206241451000.12530-100000@zot.electricrain.com>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.BSF.4.30.0206241733400.95838-100000@peswar.pair.com>
Mbox:
idm.0206.gz
another thing i would like to make sure of is that any and all such agreements (permission slips, contracts, authorizations, whatever) include specifically that this agreement includes any retroactive fees, since CARP specifies that broadcasters are also responsible for fees going back to 1998. -rachel (dj pie) piesarenice.net -- <marklar> I cried that I had no lever, until I met a man with no fulcrum. On Mon, 24 Jun 2002, Lukas Bergstrom wrote:
quoted 12 lines Good idea, Mizz Summer.> Good idea, Mizz Summer. > > First: does anyone know if this is how it works? Could Warp or Force Inc > just issue a blanket "our music can be freely webcast"? Or have they > given some of their rights to negotiate this stuff to the RIAA somehow? > I'd be interested to see pointers to responsible legal opinion on this. > > Either way, labels willing to have their stuff webcast would pretty much > have a monopoly on net listeners. Ka-ching. > > Lukas >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org