179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
James R Bamford
To:
excm. prin. fuminaro konoye , James R Bamford
Cc:
Date:
Thu, 31 Jan 2002 23:34:33 -0000
Subject:
RE: [idm] VBR vs fixed rate ripping
Msg-Id:
<PPEOJEIEFLAONFNHJPOOCEDMDFAA.jim@jimtreats.com>
In-Reply-To:
<1CA69204-061B-11D6-B952-003065E16762@yahoo.com>
Mbox:
idm.0201.gz
quoted 13 lines -----Original Message-----> -----Original Message----- > From: excm. prin. fuminaro konoye [mailto:fuminaro@yahoo.com] > Sent: 10 January 2002 22:41 > To: James R Bamford > Cc: idm@hyperreal.org > Subject: Re: [idm] VBR vs fixed rate ripping > > > very nice! i have been reading about lossless codecs and file > "shortening", and your take on makes it sound very attractive... it is > always better to read a thorough account of someone who has had a good > experience with a new method like this... i can't very well go ogg or > lossless yet...
Don't forget MPC isn't lossless... monkeysaudio is, and so is LPAC the open standard... if anyone in the industry is using mp3 for wave transport I'd suggest immediately to move over to MPC (-insane quality) if not one of the lossless formats.. once you put bad in you can't remove it.. of course sometimes bad is good..
quoted 2 lines many of us are tied to the mp3 format for more reasons> many of us are tied to the mp3 format for more reasons > than portable players.
FOr me it was playback on a portable and my incar mp3 player that was holding me back.. but high quality VBR mp3s (lame) were taking so long to make and were growing so large that portable use was inpractical, even when CDRs were used... so I took the jump.. and besides it good to experiment.. its all free.. and only your time is required :) Check out http://www.mp3dev.org/mp3/gpsycho/quality.html for a selection of waves that are very difficult to encode... http://lame.sourceforge.net/download/samples/fatboy.wav is a clip from the fatboy slim track that I told you about.. its a good track when encoding into an mp3 of anything less than 256k CBR that can be used to test your hifi equipment.. my speakers blur the artefact so that you can't hear it, my Sennheiser HD600 headphones tho bring it firmly into view.. its horrible.. and through them phones still audible as I said at 320k/s ... mp3 just can't hack it... hopefully it will be possible sooner than anyone
quoted 2 lines has thought, as portable computing devices progress and become smaller> has thought, as portable computing devices progress and become smaller > at the same time...
Any other format support would be nice but the masses using mp3 don't help..
quoted 9 lines why is this on the idm list? perhaps the community is tied to mp3 more> > why is this on the idm list? perhaps the community is tied to mp3 more > than anyone would like... all though it's not all bad... i recall > reading that the very first kid 606 remix projects with his pals were > mostly done using laptops and mp3's, and i'm sure this is only one > example out of many... can anyone fill in the details on that kid 606 > story? > >
MPC all the way :) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org