179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Philip Sherburne
To:
'idm@hyperreal.org'
Date:
Thu, 7 Jun 2001 12:19:00 -0700
Subject:
[idm] re: IDM - Intelligence vs Emotion
Msg-Id:
<8EF2E9ED35FFD411BACA00508BCF57C20353CFF7@sagan.askjeeves.com>
Mbox:
idm.0106.gz
quoted 1 line What do you folks think?>What do you folks think?
I think, frankly, that you have just doomed the list to another week of half-assed amateur art criticism, pointless bickering, namecalling, irrelevant posts, and the inevitable return to the state of agreeing to disagree, with lots of "IMHOs" thrown about. Wells will probably say something witty, at least, and maybe Alex Reuterz, if he's even still around. The point you raise is mildly interesting but I'd rather see folks go off and read some histories of conceptual art and not waste the list space on it. When you say, "It seems to me that some in the genre are going much the same way as modern art," it's so vague as to be entirely meaningless. Which modern art(s)? Grounding the debate on such shaky foundations is a sure sign that it will collapse into nothing but rhetorical rubble and puffery. Read John Cage's "Silence," then talk about "emotion" vs "intelligence." Go see one of Carsten Nicolai's installations. Perhaps interacting with music on a level other than consumerism (buying CDs as entertainment product) will open up a different space for you. Cheers, Philip