179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Adam Piontek
To:
Inconvenient Dark Matter
Date:
Tue, 8 May 2001 19:16:08 -0400
Subject:
RE: [idm] about "IDM"
Msg-Id:
<FCEOLJAIOGDIPFINNHFBMEJECDAA.apiontek@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To:
<1892cd187045.1870451892cd@homemail.nyu.edu>
Mbox:
idm.0105.gz
quoted 10 lines -----Original Message-----> -----Original Message----- > From: Aaron D Meyers [mailto:adm226@nyu.edu] > Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 7:08 PM > > Yea... we've all experienced at least a dozen threads about how much > the acronym IDM sucks, but I think using the word "experimental" in any > way to describe a genre is equally sucky. It seems to insinuate that > the process this music was created in was somehow haphazard and > aimless. Like these musicians just screwed around without a concept in > mind. I dunno.
Scientific experiments are usually very controlled, with a specific concept (a hypothesis) very much in mind. I don't know where your concept of "experimental" came from, but that's what I've always thought of when I heard the word. -adam _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org