179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
mu
To:
Cc:
Date:
Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:02:25 -0500
Subject:
Re: [idm] sequencing is lame
Msg-Id:
<5.0.2.1.1.20010410225508.00a0e600@mail.mindspring.com>
In-Reply-To:
<Pine.A41.4.31.0104101655330.91796-100000@green.weeg.uiowa. edu>
Mbox:
idm.0104.gz
I think referring to music as "sequenced" or "quantized" really implies "pre-sequenced" or "pre-quantized". So yeah, there is always temporal structure, but the difference is between music where the structure is determined before the performance, and where the structure - both micro and macro - comes into existence as the performance occurs. Matt At 04:58 PM 4/10/01 -0500, b. fagan wrote:
quoted 34 lines im very curious as to what music you listen to that is not sequenced or>im very curious as to what music you listen to that is not sequenced or >quantisized. to me this would mean no measures, time signature, etc. but >it is very possible we are working with different definitions of >"sequencing", which would screw everything up. would this mean no >patterns as well? i ask because to me tribal rythms derive their power >(and very powerful they are!) from their patterns. > >On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Josh Bown wrote: > > > I was just thinking about what makes all of the music I really love > > great, and it is because the rythym is supplied by a human being, and > > not a clock. Sequencing and quantization is terrible, lame, sucks, and > > sounds awful... When will we break free from the limits of sequenced > > music and how will it be done? is there any software out there that > > allows for composition without a sequencer? When will electronic music > > have the powerful rythyms that are found for example in primitive tribal > > ritualistic drumming???? > > > > I am a hipocrite because I use sequencing all the time, but I try like > > the rest (unsuccessfully) to make it more natural by introducing errors > > (humainization) but it just isn't the same as natural rythym > > ideosyncracies because nature isn't random, but chaotic in an > > emotionally relevant way... computers can only be semi-random and have > > no emotion at all..... > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org > > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org >For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org