Brian, what part of "new Plaid" or "interesting" didn't make sense to you?
And to Alex, I'm not an Ae hater by any stretch (you're all wrong--Garbage rules!),
but I already see the press machine for this one coming down the pike and it ain't
pretty. Warp-USA's general tactics for p.r.ing their three late-spring gems have
many writer/editors all a-twitter...and some of them are tripping over their
hyperbolic praise getting on the rah-rah wagon.
It's starting to smell kinda Daft...
laz
"Brian M. Cass" wrote:
quoted 30 lines HOLY SMOKES> HOLY SMOKES
> This guy blasts ae then goes on to laud Plaid? Plaid whose two cds are
> nearly indistinguishable from each other and are very very similar to
> their black dog stuff?!?!?!?
> Plaid who don't really have an inventive, avant garde bone in their body?
>
> On Tue, 10 Apr 2001 muziq@ionet.net wrote:
>
> > > ...are much more
> > > interesting, and Confield should top them all.
> >
> > Because?
> >
> > I've been listening to the white labels for a bit, and while COnfield is in
> > that progression Ae has been on about over the last few years, don't go for the
> > future-tense hype. Booth and Brown know they've been crawling further up their
> > own asses with each release, and Confield is just a few folds deeper. Fewer
> > crunchy pubic hair sounds, lots more colonic bass :)
> >
> > Leave all the glowing hype for the more mainstream media, who will be so
> > confused by Confield that they laud it a masterpiece.
> >
> > Want to talk interesting, talk the new Plaid.
> >
> > Laz
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org