Ugh ugh and UGH. This debate is as ludicrous as someone who debates which
operating system/patform is better. Whatever works/SOUNDS good to someone
is all that truely matters.
Radio Shack tweeters are extremely accurate... to point where they sound
horrible to most folks (that is also why they are $5/ea).
Most records go through analog mastering and saturation before hitting
44.1/16 (or anything else for that matter) by and large.
fact: Sure there are objective "factual" points to be made, but it truly
does not matter (you like how i stick "fact:" in front of my opinions?
makes me sound more credible don't it?).
I encourage this going private...
Ryan Heard
PS: You summarized quite nicely in one of your statements: "again, it's
just a matter of taste."
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeffrey Price [mailto:cymple@swbell.net]
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2000 12:14 PM
To: idm@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: [idm] why digital is bad
I thought I'd chime in on this one, it was tough to resist, even though the
opinions expressed both here and in previous posts are subjective at best.
however, that doesn't discredit any of the accurate factual info that ppl
have already added. >standard disclaimer< :)
<snip>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org