179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Kent williams
To:
iduhntuhbelluhbiguhbent duhbance muhbusuhbic
Date:
Mon, 20 Dec 1999 20:03:00 -0600 (CST)
Subject:
(idm) whither idm?
Msg-Id:
<Pine.HPP.3.96.991220194509.10152A-100000@arthur.avalon.net>
Mbox:
idm.9912.gz
You know I got into Electronic music in a big way in the early 90s with the rise of 'IDM' (aphex twin, black dog, FSOL, Orb), but over the years I've gained a real appreciation of 'real' (presumably 'stupid' by comparison) dance music. If you really study on it, even stuff like Chicago booty house has a unique character and a host of people working at the top of their form. Real dance music induces real dancing, instead of the occasional head nod and chin stroke. Now more than ever, I think that people need to really examine the whole idea of IDM, because a lot of stuff coming out seems pretty barren of the things that initially drew me to the form -- emotional depth, and some sort of rhythmic groove that compels you to move your body. And people need to widen their horizons a little. Just listening to one style of music is ultimately a limiting factor to your musical enjoyment. Everything we think of as our music succeeds or fails by how well it can incorporate and retranslate other musics. I don't think it's possible to fully understand and appreciate Selected Ambient Works by Aphex Twin unless you know the work of Raymond Scott and Eric Satie. At any rate I will always rebel against people trying to delimit the boundaries of IDM. It seems that the people who make 'this-listy' music are able to do so because of their eclectic tastes -- they can appropriate stuff beyond other music in the genre and make something new of it. kent williams -- kent@avalon.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org