179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
david turgeon
To:
William VanLoo
Cc:
Sean Cooper ,
Date:
Mon, 23 Aug 1999 12:19:31 -0400
Subject:
Re: (idm) "Glitchwerks" article
Msg-Id:
<37C17493.A120E054@evolutiontech.com>
Mbox:
idm.9908.gz
quoted 4 lines >> http://www.wfmu.org/~kennyg/popular/articles/glitchwerks.html > All in all, not a bad article....but how the hell do you do an article on > glitching CD music and not mention Oval once?!? I'm baffled, but maybe that's > just my Oval preference showing through.
what really disturbs me with this article is the simonreynoldizing found in the 'glitchwerks' term itself. puh-LEASE. glitchWORKS perhaps (if you REALLY need to coin a term), but werks? that makes it sound like some retard techno offspring, conjures up images of y34H d00D!!!! chat room lameness. as for it not mentioning oval, i don't really care. i'm much more contented by the fact that they mention DISC! (who ever does?) -- david