179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Jerry Yocky
To:
idm ,
Date:
Tue, 02 May 2000 21:17:37 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
[idm] Re: Post Rock
Msg-Id:
<Pine.A41.4.10.10005022109480.19020-100000@vesta01.SLAC.Stanford.EDU>
In-Reply-To:
<957297216.26166.ezmlm@hyperreal.org>
Mbox:
idm.0005.gz
Will, I wouldn't really consider any of those artists as post-rock. But that term is a pretty slippery one. I've seen it used to describe anyone from Low to Oval, neither of whom I think fall into that category. When I think postrock, I think Trans Am, Tortoise, Flying Saucer Attack.... But, of course, this is all open to interpretation. Check out www.post-rock.com for a little more coherent explanation of things (although I don't agree with their band listing). -Jerry
quoted 2 lines Post Rock> Post Rock > 11829 by: Will Simmons <wdsimmo@comp.uark.edu>
------------------------
quoted 14 lines Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 11:06:45 -0500> > Date: Tue, 02 May 2000 11:06:45 -0500 > To: idm@hyperreal.org > From: Will Simmons <wdsimmo@comp.uark.edu> > Subject: Post Rock > Message-ID: <390EFD15.99DCA8AD@comp.uark.edu> > > There are some new indie bands out nowadays...Broadcast is one of them, > Seely, another. I would describe their music the same way I would > describe Mouse on Mars or To Rococo Rot, only a little more heavy on the > song writing process (more guitar, vocals). Would these be considered > post rock? Also, would Stereolab be considered post rock; did they sort > of initiate the whole thing? >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org