what I was trying to say was that Not For Threes is light years ahead of the
new BD singles, I agree that NFT itself is not an exceptional album but is
100 times better than that BD shite.
sge
-----Original Message-----
From: daniel <daniel@eliteware.com>
To: sge <sge@breathemail.net>
Cc: james r mcpherson <andregurov@juno.com>; IDM List <idm@hyperreal.org>
Date: 10 May 1999 05:47
Subject: Re: (idm) Babble on ...
quoted 3 lines On Fri, 7 May 1999, sge wrote:>On Fri, 7 May 1999, sge wrote:
>
>> absoulute crap, the worst I've heard so far by the once invincible BD.
Not
quoted 22 lines For Threes is light years ahead...>> For Threes is light years ahead...
>>
>> sge
>
>
>I am going to have to slightly disagree on this one. There is about 1
>track per single that is quite good. The other tracks are fair. The
>overall sound of the singles is very much done in a world music style
>(hell, I could see some of it being released on Peter Gabriel's Real World
>label). The singles are definitely more straight forward (if not popish)
>than other BD releases (there are a couple of exceptions though). A
>definite try before you buy it release. The Jimmy Cauty remix on CD1 imho
>is a highlight. But then again I am a sucker for anything KLF related.
>
>As for not for threes being light years ahead...well that is a whole
>different can of worms...
>
>
>-daniel
>Head Monkey
>Mad Monkey Records
>