179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
To:
Cc:
Date:
Fri, 16 Jan 1998 21:07:05 EST
Subject:
Re: (idm) Zeitgeist vs. meta-geist
Msg-Id:
<19980117.210701.16191.2.tweibrecht@juno.com>
Mbox:
idm.9801.gz
On Fri, 16 Jan 1998 19:34:36 +0000 (GMT) Ashok Divakaran <adivakaran@worldbank.org> writes:
quoted 28 lines Irene C. sez>>> Irene C. sez> >> >> >> it later as a newcomer, you may still appreciate its musicality or >> originality *for its time* but you may never truly live that music >or >> have it engrained into your bloodstream the way you will with >> music that forms part of your growing and evolving experience. >> >> >> If I had the time, motivation, or words, I'd assert that there are >different >> ways to come to experience music... radio, dancefloor, >dub-on-tape-from-friend >> -- and they're all valid and significant. >> >> Is it not possible to come to experience music from the past and >still *truly >> live* the music and have it engrained in your bloodstream? > >Yes, it is, but not quite in the same way. Anyone who still plays >Howard >Jones (I plead guilty - only on occasion, though) without blushing >will know >what I mean :-) > >Ashok >
...or berlin.... np: dont ask.... tom w