: > people can only govern their own actions.
:
: Ah, but other people can also give their opinion of said people's
: actions when they post to a public mailing list, no?
well of course. and those not interested can
skip over threads.
: > if someone wants to copy MP3's fine, there
: > should be some legal system to deal with it,
: > and isn't there? its just not inforced.
: But blatant advertising of this practice here is ok?
no its not ok : but its not the only problems this
list has. but i guess each person is going to have
to deal with in their own way until people start getting
booted for continued annoyances. like this post.
: > and if someone treasures their vinyl or neatly
: > tDR designed CD, and can't stand the thought
: > of having ugly looking CDR's laying around, fine.
:
: I love it all, as long as the music is good.
i love the music + the artwork.
: That's why everything I ever say is IMHO.
:
: Guess what?
:
: Sometimes people will see your side of the arguement,
: think about it a bit and maybe rethink their position.
definately. and that works with some causes / some
people. but the MP3/napster situation is pretty
divided. and i know its harder to convince some
broke bloke to buy records and quit ripping artists
off, then it is to tell them stealing someones car.
but thats a no brainer, right?
: > theft is theft. something is missing.
:
: Huh?
i was just saying most people consider theft
when you actually take a possession from
somebody.
some people can't translate or fail to see
that an MP3 is actually a lost dollar amount
from an artist. used items could fall under
this discussion too i beleive.
: > copying is copying. source is still there. unlike
: > theft of material items. and you can make charts
: > and graphs of all the money lost that you want.
: > hell thats their excuse for high prices on music,
: > a percentage for pirating figured into the price.
:
: Nice rationalization you've got going there too.
well whatever. the software industry has proved it.
: > information is information. once anything
: > gets put in digital form you can argue and yell till
: > your head explodes / but their just hasn't been
: > an effective way of dealing with it. but at the end of
: > the day its hard for me to beleive that aphex twin is really out
: > 10 grand.
:
: That wasn't the point of Christian's post, was it?
it really was a general statement / a IMO. not directed
towards the originator.
: > and what release was aphex twins remix of autumn acid
: > on?
:
: I'm not 100%, but I think this is a classic case of someone using
: napster who has no idea what they were doing...titling a song.
ah / figures.
: Try µ-ziq's 'royal astronomy', perhaps?
oh, so there is hope from M.P's latest output?
allright i'll go back to my eyes wide shut DVD.
how appropriate.
klint.d
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org