179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Nate Harrison [Digital Magician Inc]
To:
Tim Zeigler
Cc:
idm
Date:
Fri, 27 Jun 1997 00:43:53 -0400 (EDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) TJ/RDJ ??
Msg-Id:
<Pine.BSI.3.95.970627003828.16950A-100000@we1.web-elite.com>
In-Reply-To:
<0c7693604041b67MAIL@mail.cvn.net>
Mbox:
idm.9706.gz
I took this to mean, when you read about TJ and RDJ in the same sentence regarding style, that they both have a beautiful sense of *melody* in spades, in that their stuff can sound likes 'songs', as opposed to relying on that cornerstone of techno/electronica called 'repitition'. Of course you are right in that they do sound very different, although their output of late has sounded very busy on both counts. There is a method to TJ's madness, their is not as coherent a method to RDJ's break style madness...but that's the point right? peace Nate On Fri, 27 Jun 1997, Tim Zeigler wrote:
quoted 11 lines TJ and AFX have #2 in spades.> > > TJ and AFX have #2 in spades. > > I've consistently seen TJ & RDJ mentioned in the same sentence regarding > styles, but fail to see much musical correlation at all. To my ears, TJ is > paving some new ground and Mr. AFX is bringing up the rear (as far as D'n B > goes). > > Tim > >
Nate Harrison Digital Magician Inc. www.digimagician.com nate@digimagician.com 313.994.7316